What preparation is necessary for Rudin's Mathematical Analysis?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

To effectively prepare for reading Rudin's "Principles of Mathematical Analysis," foundational knowledge in Axiomatic Set Theory, topology, calculus, and linear algebra is essential. Recommended resources include "Axiomatic Set Theory" by Suppes, "Munkres' Topology," and "How to Prove It" by Velleman for proof techniques. Additionally, "Elementary Analysis" by Kenneth Ross serves as a helpful precursor, focusing on single-variable topics. Access to a knowledgeable mentor, such as a professor, can significantly enhance the learning experience.

PREREQUISITES
  • Axiomatic Set Theory
  • Topology (recommended: Munkres' Topology)
  • Calculus
  • Linear Algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study "How to Prove It" by Daniel J. Velleman for proof techniques.
  • Read "Elementary Analysis" by Kenneth Ross for foundational concepts.
  • Explore MIT's OpenCourseWare for real analysis resources and problem sets.
  • Review Axiomatic Set Theory by Suppes to strengthen theoretical understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those preparing for advanced analysis courses, self-learners, and anyone seeking a deeper understanding of mathematical proofs and concepts.

stakehoagy
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I was wondering what knowledge is necessary before attempting to read Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis. I heard somewhere that Axiomatic Set Theory by Suppes is a good start. Maybe a topology book. And probably a good understanding of calculus and linear algebra. Anything else come to mind?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That sounds like a whole lot of overkill for that book. Perhaps what you've heard refers to Real and Complex Analysis? Even then...
 
Calculus. I had linear algebra prior to real analysis, but it wasn't really necessary.
 
thanks for the advice. I'm going to get the book from the library soon and get started.
 
I'd recommend Munkres' Topology as a good companion text.
 
If you aren't used to doing proofs then you might want to find a book on the basics of proofs. "How to Prove It" by Velleman has a good reputation.

If you're studying on your own, access to someone who knows analysis well (e.g. a professor) is great.

Also, MIT uses this book for their real analysis course, and the open courseware has some solutions to the problems (and extra problems).
 
try Elementary analysis by Kenneth ross. Its an easier read and it covers only single variable topics, but its good prep for rudin.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K