What preparation is necessary for Rudin's Mathematical Analysis?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the necessary preparatory knowledge and resources for reading Rudin's "Principles of Mathematical Analysis." Participants explore various foundational topics and texts that may aid in understanding the material, including calculus, linear algebra, set theory, and topology.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest a strong background in axiomatic set theory, topology, calculus, and linear algebra is necessary before tackling Rudin's text.
  • Others argue that the recommended prerequisites may be excessive, questioning the need for extensive background knowledge.
  • One participant mentions that while linear algebra was helpful, it was not essential prior to studying real analysis.
  • A recommendation is made for Munkres' Topology as a useful companion text for Rudin.
  • Another participant advises that familiarity with proof techniques is important, suggesting "How to Prove It" by Velleman as a resource.
  • Access to knowledgeable individuals, such as professors, is noted as beneficial for self-study in analysis.
  • Elementary Analysis by Kenneth Ross is proposed as an easier preparatory text that covers single-variable topics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the extent of preparation required, with some advocating for a comprehensive background and others suggesting a more minimal approach. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the necessity of specific prerequisites.

Contextual Notes

Some suggestions depend on individual learning styles and prior exposure to mathematical concepts, which may vary among participants.

stakehoagy
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I was wondering what knowledge is necessary before attempting to read Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis. I heard somewhere that Axiomatic Set Theory by Suppes is a good start. Maybe a topology book. And probably a good understanding of calculus and linear algebra. Anything else come to mind?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That sounds like a whole lot of overkill for that book. Perhaps what you've heard refers to Real and Complex Analysis? Even then...
 
Calculus. I had linear algebra prior to real analysis, but it wasn't really necessary.
 
thanks for the advice. I'm going to get the book from the library soon and get started.
 
I'd recommend Munkres' Topology as a good companion text.
 
If you aren't used to doing proofs then you might want to find a book on the basics of proofs. "How to Prove It" by Velleman has a good reputation.

If you're studying on your own, access to someone who knows analysis well (e.g. a professor) is great.

Also, MIT uses this book for their real analysis course, and the open courseware has some solutions to the problems (and extra problems).
 
try Elementary analysis by Kenneth ross. Its an easier read and it covers only single variable topics, but its good prep for rudin.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K