What prevents infinite potential with Nernst Equation

AI Thread Summary
The Nernst equation includes a log Q term, which can approach infinity if the concentration of ions on one side of a membrane nears zero, leading to potential inaccuracies. As ion concentration decreases, the driving force for diffusion increases, but the equation's predictions may not hold true at very low concentrations. The log function's sublinear nature complicates the relationship between concentration and EMF, suggesting that other factors may limit voltage output in real-world scenarios. Additionally, at low ion concentrations, the exchange current density drops, affecting the electrochemical behavior and rendering the equation less reliable. This raises questions about the observed voltage in galvanic cells under such conditions.
Gama
Messages
5
Reaction score
3
The nernst equation has a log Q term. The denominator of that could be very close to zero. That would make Q close to infinity and log Q close to infinity. How high can the EMF be due to concentration in the real world and why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Nernst equation is E = \frac{R T}{z F} \ln\frac{[\text{ion outside cell}]}{[\text{ion inside cell}]}.

As the concentration of ions on one side of the membrane goes down (towards zero), the driving force on ions on the other side of the membrane goes up- that's simple diffusion. Since the log function is sublinear, I'ts not clear what you are having problems with.
 
I wasn't thinking of membranes in particular. The log of infinity is infinity. My guess is the limiting factor is some other half reaction or diffusion of ions from one side of a battery to the other. Even if this is the case the Nernst equation makes it appear that a much higher voltage can be obtained from a concentration gradient than I think can occur.
 
I would imagine the Nernst equation loses accuracy at low ion concentrations. The physics would change and the equation would no longer be correct.

Wiki (not the most authoritative source, I realize) seems to agree:


At very low concentrations of the potential determining ions, the potential predicted by Nernst equation tends to ±infinity. This is physically meaningless because, under such conditions, the exchange current density becomes very low, and then other effects tend to take control of the electrochemical behavior of the system.
 
How would you explain a 0.1V current when the concentration of copper ions in solution is 0M ?

This is in a zinc || copper galvanic cell (with salt bridge) and the [Zn2+] is 1M?

I thought that the copper ions attract the electrons? Am I mistaken?
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top