What Prevents Quark-Antiquark Annihilation in Neutral Pions and J/ψ Mesons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TrickyDicky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Annihilation
TrickyDicky
Messages
3,507
Reaction score
28
I was wondering, for instance in a neutral pion or the j/ψ meson, what prevents quark-antiquark annihilation during its short lifetime? I mean what allows them to be particles, shouldn't annihilation be inmediate? is it the time it takes quark and antiquark to collide inside the particle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TrickyDicky said:
I was wondering, for instance in a neutral pion or the j/ψ meson, what prevents quark-antiquark annihilation during its short lifetime? I mean what allows them to be particles, shouldn't annihilation be inmediate? is it the time it takes quark and antiquark to collide inside the particle?

Yes, you can think of the lifetime as a measure of the average amount of time that it takes for the antiparticle to collide with the particle. It turns out that this is inversely proportional to the probability of finding the antiparticle at the same location of the particle, ##|\psi(0)|^2##. Here ##\psi(x)## is the wavefunction of the antiparticle in coordinates where the particle is located at ##x=0##.

Note that the annihilation process is statistical. In a large sample of particle-antiparticle bound states, some bound states will annihilate faster, while others slower. The lifetime is the average amount of time we have to wait for around 63% of an initial sample to decay.
 
All those particles decay extremely quickly, about 10-16s for the neutral pion (which cannot decay via the strong interaction), about 10-20s for the J/psi, less for most (all?) other states.
 
Last edited:
Ok, thanks.
 
The pions (or in general the light pseudo-scalar mesons) are protected by the special fact that they are (nearly) Goldstone bosons of the spontaneously broken chiral symmetry of QCD. With massless quarks (i.e. exact chiral symmetry) and QCD only the pseudo-scalar mesons would be exactly massless and stable. Mechanisms for their decay are related to weak interactions and axial anomaly.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top