Schools What qualities make a good graduate school advisor?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the critical aspects of choosing a graduate school advisor, drawing insights from an article titled "Lessons from Graduate School." Both Zz and the essay's author emphasize the necessity of selecting an advisor with expertise in the field, but they also highlight the importance of support, understanding, and a strong mentor-student relationship. Zz stresses the value of having an advisor who is well-known and respected, while the essay's author argues that personal compatibility and mentorship qualities are more crucial for student success. Overall, both perspectives agree on the significance of a positive working relationship and effective communication in enhancing the graduate school experience.
ZapperZ
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
32,814
Reaction score
4,725
If you haven't read it yet, you may want to:

http://www.physicsweb.org/articles/world/18/7/3

Compare what he says about choosing an advisor with what I have described in my essay.

Zz.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's a good article. Thanks for sharing it.
 


After reading the article "Lessons from Graduate School", it is clear that the author Zz and the writer of the essay have similar experiences and lessons to share when it comes to choosing an advisor in graduate school. Both Zz and the writer emphasize the importance of finding an advisor who not only has expertise in your field of study, but also someone who is supportive, understanding and has a good working relationship with their students.

Zz mentions the importance of finding an advisor who is supportive and understanding of their students' needs and goals. This is similar to the writer's advice of finding an advisor who is a good mentor and takes the time to understand their students' strengths and weaknesses. Both agree that a good advisor should be able to guide and motivate their students towards success.

In addition, both Zz and the writer highlight the importance of having a good working relationship with your advisor. Zz mentions that having a good rapport with your advisor can make the research process more enjoyable and productive. Similarly, the writer emphasizes the importance of having open communication and a positive dynamic with your advisor, as it can greatly impact your overall graduate school experience.

However, there is one key difference between Zz's perspective and the writer's perspective on choosing an advisor. While Zz believes that it is important to choose an advisor who is well-known and respected in their field, the writer suggests that it is more important to find someone who is a good fit for you personally, regardless of their reputation. The writer believes that a supportive and understanding advisor can have a greater impact on a student's success than a prestigious advisor who may not have the same level of support and guidance.

In conclusion, both Zz and the writer offer valuable insights into the process of choosing an advisor in graduate school. They both stress the importance of finding someone who is not only knowledgeable in your field, but also a good mentor and has a positive working relationship with their students. However, while Zz places more emphasis on the advisor's reputation, the writer believes that finding a good fit personally is key to a successful graduate school experience.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
63
Views
8K
Back
Top