What really happens when we tighten our muscles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Skhandelwal
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Gripping a ping pong racket tightly can lead to health issues, particularly affecting connective tissues like tendons and ligaments rather than the muscles themselves. Muscle contraction involves fibers that shorten when excited by neurons, requiring energy and potentially leading to lactic acid buildup if overexerted. This can cause soreness and fatigue, limiting the duration of a tight grip. While consistent gripping may strengthen wrist muscles, it can also reduce flexibility and control, impacting performance. Additionally, there is a risk of developing conditions like carpal tunnel syndrome, primarily associated with repetitive motions rather than tension alone. A balanced grip pressure is recommended for better control and speed in the game.
Skhandelwal
Messages
400
Reaction score
3
I play ping pong and I was wondering if it bad for my health if I grip my racket as tight as I can all the time. I was wondering what biologically goes on when I tighten my muscles?

Thx.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
To answer your implied question: keeping muscles taut usually does less damage to the muscle than it does to connective tissue - tendons, ligaments, and their friends.

A simple model of muscle contraction( all muscles work by contraction) is
to think of small bundles of fibers that can relax and lengthen when any external force is applied ( like your arm going straight down your side when you relax all the muscles in it. Gravity is the external force in this example).

When the fibers are excited by neurons, they shorten. They resist being stretched. The more fibers that contract, the stronger the pull they extert. To do this the muscle burns energy. If the muscle tissue is used to a lot of exercise the "burning" tends to be more aerobic, more efficient. If the muscle is not used to exercise or is over-exterting, the buring is anaerobic and results in the buildup of byproducts like lactic aicd - one cause of sore muscles after over-exertion.
 
The exact process of muscle contraction is fairly complicated, but it's essentially like a bunch of scales or shingles that slide over each other. You could sort of think of it like a series of linear-induction motors stacked up so that the armature of one carries the field coils for the next. Or, if you prefer, look at how a radio antenna telescopes in and out, then envision it as flat rather than cylindrical.
Gripping something tighter will reduce the length of time that you can hold it, since the lactic acid and other fatigue poisons will accumulate faster. Your wrist might get stronger all of the time, since muscles grow by being damaged and then repairing themselves to be bigger. There's also the possibility, I suppose, of developing carpal tunnel syndrome, but I think that's more caused by repetive motion rather than tension.
I would think, having played the game in my youth, that the worst thing about gripping as hard as you can would be the reduction of flexibility in handling the paddle. You'd probably have better control and speed with a firm, yet moderate, pressure.

edit: Oops; just saw your post, Jim. Good one.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...

Similar threads

Back
Top