What Reverse Potential Difference is Required to Stop a Current in a Photoelectric Cell with a Caesium Surface?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the reverse potential difference needed to stop a current in a photoelectric cell with a caesium surface. The work function of caesium is 1.35 eV, and the energy of the incoming light is calculated to be 3.11 eV using its wavelength of 400 nm. The maximum kinetic energy of the emitted electrons is determined to be 1.76 eV, which directly relates to the potential difference required to stop the current. The correct reverse potential difference is confirmed to be 1.76 V, emphasizing the importance of unit conversion when applying formulas. The participants highlight the significance of understanding the relationship between energy and potential difference in the context of photoelectric effects.
nathan17
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The work function of caesium is 1.35eV. A photoelectric cell has a caesium surface and is illuminated with monochromatic light of wavelength 400nm. What reverse potential difference must be applied to the tube to just stop a current passing through it?

Homework Equations


Kmax = Vs * e
E = hf = hc / λ

The Attempt at a Solution


λ = 400nm = 4.00x10-7
E = hf = hc / λ
= 6.63x10-34 * 3x108 / 4.00x10-7
= 4.97x10-19J
= 4.97x10-19 / 1.6x10-19
= 3.11 eV

Kmax = E - W
= 3.11 - 1.35
= 1.76

Kmax = Vs * e
Divide both sides by e
Vs = K / e
= 1.76 / 1.6x10-19
= 1.1x1019

Other Information

Now, the answer in the back of the book is :
Vs = 1.76 V

I got that in the second step, but I'm not sure if I worked it out correctly. Can someone go over this and check it out for me.

Cheers,
Nathan
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
nathan17 said:

Homework Statement


The work function of caesium is 1.35eV. A photoelectric cell has a caesium surface and is illuminated with monochromatic light of wavelength 400nm. What reverse potential difference must be applied to the tube to just stop a current passing through it?

Homework Equations


Kmax = Vs * e
E = hf = hc / λ

The Attempt at a Solution


λ = 400nm = 4.00x10-7
E = hf = hc / λ
= 6.63x10-34 * 3x108 / 4.00x10-7
= 4.97x10-19J
= 4.97x10-19 / 1.6x10-19
= 3.11 eV

Kmax = E - W
= 3.11 - 1.35
= 1.76

Kmax = Vs * e
Divide both sides by e
Vs = K / e
= 1.76 / 1.6x10-19
= 1.1x1019

Other Information

Now, the answer in the back of the book is :
Vs = 1.76 V

I got that in the second step, but I'm not sure if I worked it out correctly. Can someone go over this and check it out for me.

Cheers,
Nathan

No, that's not quite what you got in the second step; you got the numerical value but it was a different quantity. In the second step, you found the maximum kinetic energy was 1.76 eV. Now the reason that electron volts is such a useful unit is exactly because of what you observed. If an electron (or anything with charge e) goes through a potential difference of 1 V, its energy changes by 1 eV.

In your third step, if you want to divide by e=1.6\times 10^{-19} coulombs, you have to first convert the energy to joules. But to convert from eV to J, you have to multiply by 1.6\times 10^{-19}, and so you end up with the same number as what you had in step 2.
 
alphysicist said:
No, that's not quite what you got in the second step; you got the numerical value but it was a different quantity. In the second step, you found the maximum kinetic energy was 1.76 eV. Now the reason that electron volts is such a useful unit is exactly because of what you observed. If an electron (or anything with charge e) goes through a potential difference of 1 V, its energy changes by 1 eV.

In your third step, if you want to divide by e=1.6\times 10^{-19} coulombs, you have to first convert the energy to joules. But to convert from eV to J, you have to multiply by 1.6\times 10^{-19}, and so you end up with the same number as what you had in step 2.

Oh. Heh, thanks. so it should be:

K = 1.76 * 1.6x10-19
= 2.8x10-19

So,
Vs = K / e
= 2.8x10-19 / 1.6x10-19
= 1.76 V

Cheers for the help,
really appreciate it!

Nathan
 
Last edited:
Think of the physics of the situation:

An electron volt is the amount of energy that an electron receives when accelerated by a potential of 1 volt. When you subtract the work function from the energy for an incoming photon, you get the energy of the emitted electron, in electron volts. This difference, then is exactly the energy that you need to decelerate the electron to rest; since you have a single electron, the choice of units is convenient! 1.76 volts is the potential difference that can stop an electron with energy 1.76 eV.

To this end, your work is correct, but you need to be careful with the formula in the third step. A volt is a joule per coulomb. If you want to use that formula, you need to put the electron energy in joules first.
 
Or, what alphysicist said.

That'll teach me to get a snack while writing a post!
 
will.c said:
Think of the physics of the situation:

An electron volt is the amount of energy that an electron receives when accelerated by a potential of 1 volt. When you subtract the work function from the energy for an incoming photon, you get the energy of the emitted electron, in electron volts. This difference, then is exactly the energy that you need to decelerate the electron to rest; since you have a single electron, the choice of units is convenient! 1.76 volts is the potential difference that can stop an electron with energy 1.76 eV.

To this end, your work is correct, but you need to be careful with the formula in the third step. A volt is a joule per coulomb. If you want to use that formula, you need to put the electron energy in joules first.

Hmm, thanks for the explanation guys!

Yeah, it's the things like that, that I really need to be careful of when working these out when it comes exam time.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top