What role does the delta function play in quantum mechanics and field theory?

Ratzinger
Messages
291
Reaction score
0
As I read in my quantum mechanics book the delta function is sometimes called the sampling function because it samples the value of the function at one point.
\int {\delta (x - x')} f(x')dx' = f(x)

But then I opened a quantum field book and I found equations like that:
\phi (x) = \frac{1}{{(2\pi )^{3/2} }}\int {d^4 p\delta (p^2 } - m^2 )A(p)e^{ - ip \cdot x}

(\partial _\nu \partial ^\nu + m^2 )\phi (x) = \frac{1}{{(2\pi )^{3/2} }}\int {d^4 p( - p^2 } + m^2 )\delta (p^2 - m^2 )A(p)e^{ - ip \cdot x}

Can someone explain me what the delta function does here? What it is sampling? How these equations work?

thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The delta function does the same thing!

I don't know if "sampling" is a good adjective, but I'll run with it. In the integral

\int d^4 p \, \delta (p^2 - m^2 )A(p)e^{ - ip \cdot x}

you're "sampling" the function A(p)e^{ - ip \cdot x} over the region where p^2 - m^2 = 0.

We can reduce this down to the known case, if we like, as follows: we can split this up into an iterated integral, with p_0 being the innermost. Then we have:

<br /> \iiint \int \delta(p_0^2 - \vec{p}\,{}^2 - m^2) A(p) e^{-ip \cdot x} \, dp_0 \, d^3 \vec{p}<br />

so the innermost integral is of the form:

<br /> \int \delta(x^2 - a^2) f(x) \, dx<br />

Now, if I make the substitution u = x^2, we have du = 2 x dx so that dx = du / 2 \sqrt{u}, and the integral becomes

(yes, I know I'm being lazy with the bounds -- note that when tracing x over (-\infty, +\infty), u traces over [0, +\infty) twice! I really should break the integral up into two parts)

<br /> \int \delta(u - a^2) f(\sqrt{u}) \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{u}} \, du<br />

which becomes (one term for each of the times u traces over 0, +\infty):

<br /> f(a) \frac{1}{2a} - f(-a) \frac{1}{-2a}<br /> = \frac{f(a) + f(-a)}{2a}<br />

I'll leave it to you to work out the general case when the argument to \delta is an arbitrary function of the dummy variable.

Anyways, if my intuition about these things is anywhere close to accurate, your integral for \phi(x) should reduce to a surface integral over the hypersurface given by the equation p^2 - m^2 = 0.
 
Last edited:
Ratzinger said:
As I read in my quantum mechanics book the delta function is sometimes called the sampling function because it samples the value of the function at one point.
\int {\delta (x - x&#039;)} f(x&#039;)dx&#039; = f(x)
But then I opened a quantum field book and I found equations like that:
\phi (x) = \frac{1}{{(2\pi )^{3/2} }}\int {d^4 p\delta (p^2 } - m^2 )A(p)e^{ - ip \cdot x}
(\partial _\nu \partial ^\nu + m^2 )\phi (x) = \frac{1}{{(2\pi )^{3/2} }}\int {d^4 p( - p^2 } + m^2 )\delta (p^2 - m^2 )A(p)e^{ - ip \cdot x}
Can someone explain me what the delta function does here? What it is sampling? How these equations work?
thank you
notice here that the delta function has as its argument quadratic functions. It can be a little confusing about what to do with these. Well just use this formula:
\delta[g(x)]=\sum_i\frac{\delta(x-x_i)}{|g&#039;(x_i)|}
by the way, the sum is over the roots of g.
In your equation above, after you use this step everything should be clear- it functions just how you would expect it to.
and check out this page for help with dirac delta functions
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/DeltaFunction.html
 
thanks Hurykl, thanks Norman, thanks physicsforums, thanks the Internet

and a great weekend to everybody
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top