What Sets Kinetic Energy Apart from Flow Work?

AI Thread Summary
Kinetic energy and flow work are distinct concepts due to the nature of energy transfer in fluid dynamics. Kinetic energy pertains to the energy of an object in motion, while flow work is the energy required to move fluid through a system, influenced by factors like internal energy changes and viscous forces. The work done on the fluid contributes to the overall energy balance within a control volume but cannot be directly equated to kinetic energy. A detailed energy analysis is necessary to understand these differences fully. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurate fluid dynamics modeling and analysis.
Mohankpvk
Messages
102
Reaction score
3
As per work energy principle, the energy spent in moving an object is stored as kinetic energy.Flow work is done to make the fluid move.Why is it not included in kinetic energy (i.e) why kinetic energy and flow work are considered seperately?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mohankpvk said:
Why is it not included in kinetic energy (i.e) why kinetic energy and flow work are considered seperately?

the flow of liquids are a bit complicated due to internal energy changes , may be temperature change, viscous forces as well as the

molecular motions, i think a detail energy analysis is required. and one can not simply equate the work done to the K.E. of the flow.

The forces that act on the surface of a control volume do work on the fluid in the control volume and therefore contribute to the energy

balance. The power (energy per second) put into the fluid within the control volume is given by the classical relation from mechanics P ower input to the control volume = F - U

there is an interesting analysis in the following reference-

<https://web.stanford.edu/~cantwell/AA210A_Course_Material/AA210A_Course_Notes/AA210_Fundamentals_of_Compressible_Flow_Ch_01_BJ_Cantwell.pdf>
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top