What should I do about this class?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sydneyfranke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Class
AI Thread Summary
A student is struggling in a Physics class, achieving a mid-term grade of C despite understanding the material, particularly excelling in numerical problems but failing visual interpretation questions. With a homework average close to an A, the student is contemplating dropping the course before the deadline, which would be their only allowed drop in the first 60 hours of coursework. Concerns include the impact of a C on future internship opportunities and the potential need for summer classes to catch up. Discussions highlight the importance of mastering foundational concepts in physics and the value of experiencing setbacks for personal growth. Some argue that a C isn't detrimental and may even demonstrate resilience, while others emphasize the necessity of a solid grasp of the material for future academic and career success. The professor does not curve grades, leading to uncertainty about the student's final outcome.
sydneyfranke
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
So here's the slight problem I'm running into. I have this Physics class that's not really going as planned. I understand the information, I'm just (slightly) bombing the tests. I get all of the questions involving numbers, but the "supposed something visually and tell me what the ball does" questions get me every time. Basically, the average of my tests so far is 4 points from a B and my homework grade is around a low A so my mid-term grade for the class is a C.

I'm not really excited about seeing a C on my transcript. I know that I'm pretty close to a B, but the past two tests I have understood the information forwards and backwards and still manage to not get the grades that reflects my understanding. I realize that one could say "well obviously you didn't know the information if you have a C." But, the point is that I'm not just screwing around and have found myself looking at this grade, I'm busting my butt.

So, we don't have another test before the drop date, so I'm considering dropping the course. I really don't want to do this because it's just going to push me back (just because of the way the classes line up) so its either that or take some summer classes to play catch-up. This isn't ideal either as I was hoping to get into an internship or reu this summer. Another problem I have with dropping this class is that my engineering school only allows students to drop 1 course during the first 60 hours of coursework. So this would be my one drop. I feel that would put a lot of pressure on me for my remaining courses.

Basically, I feel like I could pull a B for the course but if I don't do well on my next test I will be stuck with whatever grade I get because it will be past the drop date. Should I risk this for the chance to come out with a B and not have to burn my only drop for a while? Or is eating a C not as bad as I'm thinking it is? I have a 3.75 now and still have a ways to go, but it would be nice to set myself up okay for internships and stuff like that.

Oh, and the professor doesn't drop or curve anything, though there are rumors that he will replace the lowest test grade with the final grade, but those are rumors that I'm not trusting.

Sorry for the essay.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What course is it? There's a big difference between getting a C in Physics 101 as a first-year and getting a C in classical mechanics as a first year. Just want to make sure we have the relevant information, although it sounds like it's an introductory class...
 
Just to add on: would there be a severe penalty in the future career of a physics student if they didn't master calculus-based physics the first time around? I'm talking about the sophomore level class (usually) that comes before the 'classical mechanics' and 'classical e&m theory' classes.
 
fss - Intro Physics. Sorry. Taking it with Calculus I and doing pretty good in there.

hadsed - Good add on.
 
hadsed said:
Just to add on: would there be a severe penalty in the future career of a physics student if they didn't master calculus-based physics the first time around? I'm talking about the sophomore level class (usually) that comes before the 'classical mechanics' and 'classical e&m theory' classes.

I suppose that depends what you mean by 'master'. After you've been through an intro class, you should be able to do the homework problems without much struggle.
 
The problems are manageable and I hate the approach taken in these classes to mechanically learn all the ways to solve these problems. To me, that doesn't teach you anything except how to do textbook problems (obviously). I can definitely figure out all the problems, but I'm not lightning quick at them though I do understand the concepts fully. I'd rather use my time mastering more useful things (not trying to be snotty, but if classical mech/e&m will teach it to me in a better way, why not just 'master' it then?).
 
Because one builds upon the other. As with anything, you need a good solid foundation of the basics before you plan to move on to more complicated endeavors.

You need to learn how to walk first before dreaming of running.

To the OP: You can't really say you understand the material if you're "bombing" the tests.
 
Can you explain how averaging a low A and 4 points from a B works out to a C? I don't think you are in as much trouble as you think you are.
 
sydneyfranke said:
So here's the slight problem I'm running into. I have this Physics class that's not really going as planned. I understand the information, I'm just (slightly) bombing the tests. I get all of the questions involving numbers, but the "supposed something visually and tell me what the ball does" questions get me every time. Basically, the average of my tests so far is 4 points from a B and my homework grade is around a low A so my mid-term grade for the class is a C.

I'm not really excited about seeing a C on my transcript. I know that I'm pretty close to a B, but the past two tests I have understood the information forwards and backwards and still manage to not get the grades that reflects my understanding. I realize that one could say "well obviously you didn't know the information if you have a C." But, the point is that I'm not just screwing around and have found myself looking at this grade, I'm busting my butt.

So, we don't have another test before the drop date, so I'm considering dropping the course. I really don't want to do this because it's just going to push me back (just because of the way the classes line up) so its either that or take some summer classes to play catch-up. This isn't ideal either as I was hoping to get into an internship or reu this summer. Another problem I have with dropping this class is that my engineering school only allows students to drop 1 course during the first 60 hours of coursework. So this would be my one drop. I feel that would put a lot of pressure on me for my remaining courses.

Basically, I feel like I could pull a B for the course but if I don't do well on my next test I will be stuck with whatever grade I get because it will be past the drop date. Should I risk this for the chance to come out with a B and not have to burn my only drop for a while? Or is eating a C not as bad as I'm thinking it is? I have a 3.75 now and still have a ways to go, but it would be nice to set myself up okay for internships and stuff like that.

Oh, and the professor doesn't drop or curve anything, though there are rumors that he will replace the lowest test grade with the final grade, but those are rumors that I'm not trusting.

Sorry for the essay.

Hey there, I'm not a physics but a double math major. One thing I tend to see in this forums is people freaking out about not getting A's or even high B's.

I don't know if people will agree with this but I think getting C's are good for personal development. When we get the C's it can help us become mentally mature in that we aren't afraid of failure and that we get a taste of what failure feels like.

Let us say you want to do research, whether its in industry or academia. Now let's say you have to get to an interview for some role whether its for a PhD spot or for postdoc in uni or industry.

For the PhD scenario, I guarantee that the school will want to assess as accurately as possible how you respond to failure. All decent employers do it with their staff. Doesn't matter if you're writing computer games under deadlines (I used to do this) or whether you're a trainee trader in financial services. The fact is for anything that is worthwhile, we make mistakes, make bad assumptions, and generally **** up.

If you got decent grades but not perfect and you demonstrated to a board of people that you have done hard classes and not aced them, but never the less pushed ahead challenged yourself and reflected on your ability to persevere under pressure, then imo you will be looked on favorably a lot more than the person who has never failed majorly in their life who might be so fragile that they buckle considerably when they find out that they aren't as perfect as their grades tell them to be.

Just to note that I'm not knocking people with perfect 4.0's (I rather congratulate them) and I'm sure that people who get these marks deserve them (I'm not a 4.0 person myself). I have however seen the effects personally on people where they mentally are afraid of some degree of failure and how that can have a stranglehold on their life.

If physics is a means to an end like it is for the many people that study it, then I'm sure you'll have your share of success inevitably at some point in the future.

Good luck and keep your chin up, because most things worth pursuing don't come to us without a fight.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
783
Replies
39
Views
4K
Replies
31
Views
7K
Replies
40
Views
5K
Back
Top