What Should I Major in to Become a Research Scientist: Chemistry or Physics?

Click For Summary
When considering a career as a research scientist, the choice between studying physics or chemistry largely depends on personal interests and strengths. Both fields present unique challenges; physics typically requires more mathematical skills, while chemistry may be more accessible for those who find math difficult. Job opportunities vary by specialization, with chemists generally having more industrial job prospects, though this can depend on local industries and specific fields of study. A PhD is essential for research roles in either discipline, especially for engaging in complex problems in industry. Students are advised to explore courses that bridge both fields, such as physical chemistry or chemical physics, and to strengthen their mathematics skills, as this can enhance competitiveness in both physics and chemistry. Ultimately, personal interest and aptitude play significant roles in determining the right path.
b4champ15
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I want to be some sort of a research scientist. I was wondering what you guys think would be better to study. Is one easier to get jobs with? How much harder is physics then chemistry? and finally how much would a research scientist with a masters degree earn right out of school with those degrees?
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Physics isn't harder than chemistry. No science is intrinsically more difficult than any other, they're just difficult in different ways. So the difficulty depends on your own predisposition as well as interest and attitude. Physics involves more mathematics and mathematical thinking than chemistry, which requires more than biology. So if you view maths as a 'necessary evil' then maybe chemistry is better for you (all else being equal). If you like math and it comes easy to your, then physics is probably better. Again, that's if all else is equal. In the long run, aptitude for a subject won't compensate much for a lack of interest.

Job opportunities depends mostly on what your specialization is. As far as academia is concerned, there's not a lot of difference with either physics or chemistry. As far as industrial/private-sector is concerned, I'd say chemists generally have more opportunity to find related jobs in industry. But that also depends on where you live and what your local industries are, and again your specialization. A nuclear physicist obviously has more industry jobs than a theoretical chemist, who's still probably better off than a string theorist, etc.

Either way, if you want to do research in either field you'll need a PhD, unless you intend to work more at the engineering end of things, so you probably have a while to make up your mind if you're only picking a major now. I was once told that when it comes to e.g. organic chemistry that while you could do research in industry with an M.S., all the 'fun' problems required a PhD. I wouldn't make up my mind until I'd studied the stuff. A topic that might sound fun to you might turn out to be boring in its details and how it really is, and vice-versa. If you're genuinely undecided between physics and chemistry, you might want to take courses in stuff that can be applied in both fields to keep your options open, e.g. physical chemistry/chemical physics.

And in particular: mathematics. Insufficient math skills is a deal-breaker when it comes to continued study in physics or physical chemistry and it's still useful in other areas. In my experience it can make you more competitive, even, since chemists with physicist-level math skills are unusual. In other words: A biochemistry course counts for nothing if you want to go into physics, but a math course still counts for something if you want to go into biochemistry.
 
  • Like
Likes Elvis 123456789
I came.across a headline and read some of the article, so I was curious. Scientists discover that gold is a 'reactive metal' by accidentally creating a new material in the lab https://www.earth.com/news/discovery-that-gold-is-reactive-metal-by-creating-gold-hydride-in-lab-experiment/ From SLAC - A SLAC team unexpectedly formed gold hydride in an experiment that could pave the way for studying materials under extreme conditions like those found inside certain planets and stars undergoing...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
594
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K