What software is recommended for designing microwave cavities?

AI Thread Summary
For designing microwave cavities, software recommendations include Ansoft's HFSS, which is widely used for simulating cavities and managing modifications that affect the Q factor and frequency. Users have noted that HFSS is effective for handling simple geometries and necessary alterations like optical access holes. There is interest in finding open-source alternatives, with suggestions to search for "open source 3D solver." However, the original poster lacks experience with 3D solvers. Overall, HFSS is the primary recommendation for microwave cavity design.
csopi
Messages
81
Reaction score
2
Hi all,

I need a proper software for designing microwave cavities. I intend to use simple base geometries (e.g. closed box) with some modifications, like holes for optical access or for feeding the MW. These modifications however may seriously affect the Q factor, the frequency or might prevent some modes to develop etc. and I need to control these issues.

I would like to ask for a recommendation. Which software should I use? Any suggestions will be appreciated!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Sounds like a job for one of Ansoft's products. A quick search of "Ansoft microwave cavity" reveals many papers on the subject. They indicated that researchers use HFSS for simulating cavities.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you, I'll look into it! Just out of curiosity: do you know any open source alternative?
 
google "open source 3d solver". I have no experience with any 3D solvers though.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...

Similar threads

Back
Top