What Speed Do Ice Skaters Reach After a Collision?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sweedeljoseph
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accident Ice
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around calculating the post-collision speed of two ice skaters who collide head-on. The first skater has a mass of 35 kg and travels at 12 m/s, while the second skater, weighing 65 kg, moves at 4 m/s in the opposite direction. The correct final speed after the collision, when they stick together, is 1.6 m/s, which was initially misunderstood due to incorrect sign usage for the second skater's velocity. The resolution highlights the importance of considering direction in velocity calculations, as the second skater's speed should be negative to reflect its opposite direction. Understanding vector direction is crucial for accurate momentum conservation calculations in collisions.
sweedeljoseph

Homework Statement


A 35 kg ice skater traveling at 12 m/s runs head-on into a 65 kg skater traveling straight forward at 4 m/s. At what speed do the ice skaters travel if they move (stuck) together after the collision?

Homework Equations


i put it below. i don't know if youre supposed to use something else. or if there's something eaiser.

The Attempt at a Solution


answer from the teacher is 1.6 m/s.

i tried this:
m1*v1+m2*v2=m1'*v1'+m2'*v2'
m1*v1+m2*v2=v'(m1'+m2')
v=(m1*v1+m2*v2)/(m1'+m2')
v=((35*12)+(65*4))/100
v=6.8

thats what i got. is it all wrong? i know the equation stuff isn't because that's from my teacher. but when i do the math its not the same. its supposed to be 1.6 m/s. am i missing a step?

thank you!
sweedeljoseph
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
sweedeljoseph said:

Homework Statement


A 35 kg ice skater traveling at 12 m/s runs head-on into a 65 kg skater traveling straight forward at 4 m/s. At what speed do the ice skaters travel if they move (stuck) together after the collision?


Homework Equations


i put it below. i don't know if youre supposed to use something else. or if there's something eaiser.


The Attempt at a Solution


answer from the teacher is 1.6 m/s.

i tried this:
m1*v1+m2*v2=m1'*v1'+m2'*v2'
m1*v1+m2*v2=v'(m1'+m2')
v=(m1*v1+m2*v2)/(m1'+m2')
v=((35*12)+(65*4))/100
v=6.8
thats what i got. is it all wrong? i know the equation stuff isn't because that's from my teacher. but when i do the math its not the same. its supposed to be 1.6 m/s. am i missing a step?

The velocity of the second skater's not inputted correctly; reassess the system.
 
Keep in mind the skaters are skating "head on". What does that say about their directions relative to each other? So what does that say about the signs of the velocities?

Casey

Edit: Asleight is quick! Last three posts we have been typing at the same time! :smile:
 
the velocity of the 2nd skater is in wrong? i don't see where its wrong. m1=35, v1=12, m2=65 and v2=4. m1+m2=100. that's what i plugged in isn't it?

would the skaters going head on make any difference? there's no difference in the distance they traveled since they are together.
 
i got it! haha I am kind of slow. the velocity for the 2nd skater was supposed to be negative. i don't know why i guess because she's going backwards to the 1st guy. but i get it now.

thank you!
sweedeljoseph
 
sweedeljoseph said:
i got it! haha I am kind of slow. the velocity for the 2nd skater was supposed to be negative. i don't know why i guess because she's going backwards to the 1st guy. but i get it now.

thank you!
sweedeljoseph

Yes! Velocity is a vector and thus has a direction associated with it. Clearly is skater 1 is moving to the right and you consider his velocity to be positive then a skater moving in the OPPOSITE direction must have a velocity that is negative!

You could have chosen the opposite signs for each and gotten the same number. Albeit you would have gotten a negative answer, but that only indicates that the skater is moving in the opposite direction of the one you assumed it was.

Casey
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top