What the Hell. Differential Eq

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differential
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a differential equation using the method of undetermined coefficients. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the accuracy of their solution when substituted back into the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of matrices to solve for coefficients A, B, C, and D, and question the correctness of the original matrix setup. There are attempts to solve the equations derived from the differential equation, and some participants suggest alternative methods such as Laplace transforms.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing corrections to the matrix and equations. There is a mix of approaches being explored, and while some guidance has been offered, there is no explicit consensus on the best method to resolve the issue.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of potential errors in the matrix setup and assumptions made by the original poster. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to clarify these aspects without arriving at a definitive solution.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
[SOLVED] What the Hell. Differential Eq

Okay, so I used Method of undetermined coefficients for this one. I got a solution that when differentiated and plugged back in almost works, bit is off by a little.


Picture1-8.png



When I plug back into y'=4x+3y+(-5t+6)
I get y'=...+9 not 6. So I have a feeling it has to do with my D=11/7 term... but I have no idea what.

Anyone see what I am doing wrong? Is my matrix incorrect? Or my assumption of Xp? Or neither?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, I forgot to change the matrix...this is what I used to get A,B,C,D

[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cccc}6 & 1& 0 & 0\\4 & 3 & 0 & 0\\ 1 & 0 & 6 & 1\\<br /> 0 & -1 & 4 & 3\end{array}\right]*\left[\begin{array}{c}A\\B\\C\\D\end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{c}-3\\5\\0\\0\\<br /> \end{array}\right][/tex]
 
well after solving:
t: 6A+B+3=0
4A+3B-5=0
you get 14A+14=0
B=3 after solving for the next equation of t^0 you get that:
C=0 and D=-1.
I think in this simple case it's better to just solve it without matrix.
 
Your matrix is not correct. For example, your third row says "A+ 6C+ D= 0" but the corresponding equation (A= 6At+ 6C+ Bt+ D+ 3t with t= 000) is "A= 6B+ D" which is "-A+ 6C+ D= 0".
 
have you tried taking the laplace x-form of your system? (sometimes that simplifies the problem)
 
loop quantum gravity said:
well after solving:
t: 6A+B+3=0
4A+3B-5=0
you get 14A+14=0
B=3 after solving for the next equation of t^0 you get that:
C=0 and D=-1.
I think in this simple case it's better to just solve it without matrix.

Right. I actually just use a CAS to solve the matrix for me...so that is easier. I just could not figure out where my matrix was wrong, but I have got the same numbers as you now.

Now I am having trouble getting his to plug back in again!
 
GOT IT! Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K