What to do if your professor is not much ''intelligent''?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Headacheguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Professor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers around a Physics I midterm exam where a professor incorrectly graded a question regarding vector direction and gravity. The professor, who holds a BS in Chemical Engineering, insisted that downward acceleration is negative, despite students arguing otherwise. Participants recommend verifying the correctness of the answer with another physics professor and suggest approaching the issue diplomatically, either individually or as a group, to avoid potential backlash from the professor.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly vectors and acceleration.
  • Familiarity with academic protocols for addressing grading disputes.
  • Knowledge of effective communication strategies in academic settings.
  • Awareness of the qualifications required for teaching positions in higher education.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of vector analysis and gravitational force in physics.
  • Learn about the process for formally addressing grading disputes in academic institutions.
  • Explore effective communication techniques for discussing academic concerns with professors.
  • Investigate the qualifications and standards for faculty teaching in higher education, particularly in science disciplines.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics courses, academic advisors, and anyone involved in addressing educational quality and faculty qualifications in higher education.

  • #31
After I argue with the professor, I went stupid and decided to not pretend to listen anymore, (I usually study at home with MIT CW, because most of the time I can't understand her) read a novel from my phone.

She caught me and asked me to go out and not attend her lectures anymore, and to just see her on the final exam. She's mad at me, that's for sure.

Sidenote: Only 7 out of 51 passed the exam. Most of classmates can't/doesn't want to self-study.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
@Cristo: I answered 10 N because of the 2 kg measurement, only one significant figure.

Edit: @Phrak: I'm sorry if I was ambiguous with my terms. What I meant was that, our professor chose the downward direction as positive, hence it follows that the weight (sorry for using gravity) is positive.

@Doc_Al: It is impossible to argue with her, I doubt she has a clear understanding of the topic. Before (on the equilibrant, resultant issue), when I tried to argue from what I have read from my book about the definition of the term, she remarked that she doesn't care what I had read on my textbook.
 
Last edited:
  • #33
Headacheguy said:
@Cristo: I answered 10 N because of the 2 kg measurement, only one significant figure.
Technically, you are correct. But I would not distract the issue away from the egregious physics error on her part by bringing up significant figures.
 
  • #34
Oh, right. Thanks, Doc Al. :)

Thanks everyone. I'm still undecided whether or not I would bring this up with another professor. I'm afraid she would get pretty mad at us. One thing I've realized is that sometimes you have to decide whether the ''right thing'', (technically) is the right thing to do (politics of academia; must obey authority).

Regards to the professor background issue: I've never had a professor with a Ph. D. I've never heard of a professor with a research Ph.D that teaches in the university, I know of two professors who has Ph.D. in education. The university has a student population of 50,000 undergrads.
 
Last edited:
  • #35
It's ultimately up to you, but a teacher who refuses to accept that she's incorrect, even after having the problem explained to her, needs to be called out.
 
  • #36
Headacheguy said:
A 2 kg body is supported by a massless string. The body is accelerating downwards at a rate of 4.9 m/s^2. Calculate the tension on the string.

(It was pretty odd that this question is in the midterm exam and is worth 10 points.)

What I did was:
From F = ma:
T + (-mg) = -ma (Took the tension T as positive, therefore the weight -mg, is negative since the force is exerted on the opposite direction. The resultant force of this body is downwards, same direction with the weight, as stated in the question, -ma.)

T = mg - ma
T = 2 kg ( 9.8 m/s^2 - 4.9 m/s^2)
T = 9.8 N
T = 10 N


Her solution was a bit different because she chose the direction of the motion of the body as the positive direction. Either way, the answer should have been the same. Hence, the weight is positive, so is the direction of the resultant force, and the tension negative because it is on the upwards direction.

mg - T = ma
T = mg - ma
T = m (g - a) (This was where it went wrong, I think)
T = 2 kg [ 9.8 m/s^2 - (-4.9 m/s^2)] (The acceleration was negative because it was going "down", she explained)
T = 29.4 N (Again her answer was not in the correct significant figures.)


Most of my classmates had the same answer as mine.

Please forgive me if my solution is wrong.

Hahaha! Ask her: what if the body was accelerating downwards with a rate of more than g. Intuitively, it should put no tension on the string, and your answer indeed gives that. Put her answer would be that it put more tension on the string than without acceleration!
 
  • #37
Wow, that's quite a mistake she's defending. Her argument makes no sense, and even if it did, she should have made "g" -9.8, thus giving her the correct magnitude of tension. I think you should consult with another professor or your academic adviser. If you have a TA, then go to him/her first. This isn't just an issue of a few marks on an exam (although that in its own right is a worthy cause), but it is also an issue of your classmates receiving the education you are paying for. There's no reason why someone with a BS in ChemE couldn't be a good physics professor, but yours obviously shouldn't be teaching.
 
  • #38
Headacheguy said:
Oh, right. Thanks, Doc Al. :)

Thanks everyone. I'm still undecided whether or not I would bring this up with another professor. I'm afraid she would get pretty mad at us. One thing I've realized is that sometimes you have to decide whether the ''right thing'', (technically) is the right thing to do (politics of academia; must obey authority).

Regards to the professor background issue: I've never had a professor with a Ph. D. I've never heard of a professor with a research Ph.D that teaches in the university, I know of two professors who has Ph.D. in education. The university has a student population of 50,000 undergrads.

Dude...DO SOMETHING about this. I would be so infuriated by this. Your PAYING and spending your life on this and your teacher has no idea what they are talking about. I always call teachers out when they say something insane because I don't want all the other kids in the class thinking what ludicrous statement they just said was actually true. Thats just something I can't let get away, so maybe that's me. You said 7 out of 51 people failed the test? What if you get an F or D in this class? Will that prevent you from taking anything else? What if this happened, and it was all because you didn't stand up and do something about it when you knew you should?

Anyway, I looked at your work and that's exactly how I would have solved it, and its been confirmed by multiple physicists(I think?), so you have plenty of support.
 
  • #39
nlsherrill said:
Dude...DO SOMETHING about this. I would be so infuriated by this. Your PAYING and spending your life on this and your teacher has no idea what they are talking about. I always call teachers out when they say something insane because I don't want all the other kids in the class thinking what ludicrous statement they just said was actually true. Thats just something I can't let get away, so maybe that's me. You said 7 out of 51 people failed the test? What if you get an F or D in this class? Will that prevent you from taking anything else? What if this happened, and it was all because you didn't stand up and do something about it when you knew you should?

Anyway, I looked at your work and that's exactly how I would have solved it, and its been confirmed by multiple physicists(I think?), so you have plenty of support.

True
This is something you are usually encountered in high school level..not in university
 
  • #40
Headacheguy said:
After I argue with the professor, I went stupid and decided to not pretend to listen anymore, (I usually study at home with MIT CW, because most of the time I can't understand her) read a novel from my phone.

She caught me and asked me to go out and not attend her lectures anymore, and to just see her on the final exam. She's mad at me, that's for sure.

WHAT?? That is rediculous! How can she kick you out for being disinterested? In an intro class like yours most people are disinterested (sad, but true). Plus, you pay to take that class. I am not sure if she can legally do this.
 
  • #41
Headacheguy said:
@Doc_Al: It is impossible to argue with her, I doubt she has a clear understanding of the topic. Before (on the equilibrant, resultant issue), when I tried to argue from what I have read from my book about the definition of the term, she remarked that she doesn't care what I had read on my textbook.

So it sounds like you've stated your concerns to this teacher before. So now you can be pretty sure nothing will come from reasoning with her, so I would contact the dean of physics or dean of student services, or really any administrative body that can overrule any of her bad decisions.There's a good chance the dean will try to convince you nothing is wrong with her grading/teaching and that its simply her course policy, so it would be wise to find as many students as you can that have the same problem as you and see if they will call the dean about the same issue; then the dean doesn't have much a choice other than to review the issue and eventually solve it. 1/7 of the midterm exam is a big enough deal to make it worth pursuing corrections in my opinion. I assume that would diminsh your final grade by a few percent anyway, and it always sucks to fall one or two percent short of getting a higher letter-grade.

I understand that you are frustrated, and I can't say I blame you, but DONT SHOW YOUR ANGER WHEN DISCUSSING THESE ISSUES WITH THE DEAN. Getting angry will only make him think you are just another student that can't live with the fact that he has to take a physics course. Give the administrative officials the impression that you are a reasonable person and that you are concerned that there was an error on the midterm.
 
  • #42
You should talk to either the department chair or the dean. A pass/fail rate on a midterm of 13% screams "Problem!"

But your professor grudgingly not admitting that they were wrong in this comical case is even worse. Perhaps the professor is in over their head,teaching this course outside of their field, and is compensating by acting overly authoritarian. You should take some kind of action sooner rather than later. This is your education.

However, I am also concerned that you are at a university with 50,000 students and you have never seen a professor with a PhD? This doesn't seem right. Most universities won't let anyone without a Masters teach(grad students being the exception), and won't grant tenure(or sometimes even full time status) to someone without a PhD.
 
Last edited:
  • #43
The gravitational force on the object is 19.6 N. If the force from the tension is 29.4 N, it should be going up. That's my cursory conclusion at this moment. lol.
 
  • #44
She sounds like a tool and very immature. I'm surprised your school allows someone with a bachelors degree teach a college-level class. I would bring a group of students and complain to the dean to sort her out.
 
  • #45
I'm surprised they let her teach! What I seriously suggest is that everyone in the class who wants to should come together, put down all your complaints, detail them in a document and present it to the Head of the Physics Department (or Dean, whatever the person is called). This should carry a lot of weight. I do not think this is something you should forget about, because it seems this person is not competent to teach the course, and you are suffering for this, not only your grades but your education too, and she may teach more courses yet!
 
Last edited:
  • #46
Doc Al said:
Nothing ambiguous about the question.


Perfectly correct.

This is going soo off topic, but is it bad that I also got the same answer as her prof?

The body is going down with (in) the direction of gravity, so it should be 2kg(9.8m/s2 + 4.9m/s2) = 29.4N?
 
  • #47
flyingpig said:
This is going soo off topic, but is it bad that I also got the same answer as her prof?

The body is going down with (in) the direction of gravity, so it should be 2kg(9.8m/s2 + 4.9m/s2) = 29.4N?
Well, it's wrong. (How did you arrive at your equation? Don't just guess.)
 
  • #48
Doc Al said:
Well, it's wrong. (How did you arrive at your equation? Don't just guess.)

Both are going downwards, add the accelerations and multiply by 2kg
 
  • #49
flyingpig said:
Both are going downwards, add the accelerations and multiply by 2kg
I can see that's what you did, but why? Where's the physics? What laws did you apply?
 
  • #50
Doc Al said:
I can see that's what you did, but why? Where's the physics? What laws did you apply?

The formal way goes like this

mg - T = ma Since mg is "stronger" because it is "pulling"

mg - ma = T

m(g - a) = T

2kg(9.8 - 4.9) = T

2kg(4.9) = 9.8N

FBD that screwed me up was

[PLAIN]http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/9783/91018966.png

T = "mg + ma"

What the professor overlooked was that the problem said "accelerating downwardsat a rate of 4.9 m/s2"

The downwards part already specified the direction, adding any more signs would defeat the purpose, if it was worded like "accelerating at a rate of -4.9m/s2, then it would be right no? Because I think that's what she read
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #51
flyingpig said:
FBD that screwed me up was

...

T = "mg + ma"
"ma" should not appear on a FBD.
What the professor overlooked was that the problem said "accelerating downwardsat a rate of 4.9 m/s2"
She didn't overlook it, she messed it up. Being charitable, she forgot that she took down as positive when she went to plug in the acceleration.
 
  • #52
I might have been thinkinb about those elevator problems
 
  • #53
flyingpig said:
I might have been thinkinb about those elevator problems
Well, this is exactly analogous to the elevator problems, but she still made a mistake.
 
  • #54
G01 said:
However, I am also concerned that you are at a university with 50,000 students and you have never seen a professor with a PhD? This doesn't seem right. Most universities won't let anyone without a Masters teach(grad students being the exception), and won't grant tenure(or sometimes even full time status) to someone without a PhD.

It may depend on the country.
 
  • #55
micromass said:
I agree 100% with zketrouble. Proceed very carefully! And if possible, try to act as a group instead of individually!

I agree also.

Even if you get the professor to admit fault, he/she may hate you and grade you with bias from then on.

It's not okay, and in a perfect system people who cannot admit their faults (or make too many mistakes) should be brought to justice, but this is not a perfect world. This is one area where learning that the system IS broken will help you.

The problem is also more complicated than you see it. Professors have egos (essentially a requirement for surviving graduate school) and end up develop a strong ability to intimidate their way out of these types of situations. It does not help that they often genuinely believe they are right because students routinely and boldly challenge them when they are NOT wrong. You probably have seen a student try to challenge the professor and be wrong, I see it regularly. That repeated behavior leads to a thick skin on these issues, and it's hard for the professor to backtrack once they've already asserted that they're right. It becomes more difficult for them to see the truth through their own bias.

I had this happen to me repeatedly on different scales ranging from publicly (in front of class) exposing the problem, to privately (in office hours). I have had the range of responses, some teachers are very comfortable with the fact that they make mistakes, others are mortified of the idea and will fight you to the death over it. And they have a lot more power than you do. In general, the only "safe" way to address the problem is to avoid being seen as an outlier. You have to address it with a group or not at all.

I once had this type of problem with a professor who ran a large research facility on campus and had an entire wing of the school named after him. So you also shouldn't expect that the higher you go, the better you get (i.e. the problem isn't just that your professor doesn't have an advanced degree). In the case of the professor above, it helped me realize that in research, money and results are the deciders. Mostly money. The more money you bring in the "better" you are, and it pays to be an intimidating and confident person when it comes to research grants.

--Bob
 
  • #56
Thanks for the response everyone. I'll try to convince my classmates about it.

I also would like to apologize for bringing up multiple issues on this thread that is not in the OP. I tend to do it every time. :rolleyes:
 
  • #57
Doc Al said:
"ma" should not appear on a FBD.
I have this feeling you would say that

She didn't overlook it, she messed it up. Being charitable, she forgot that she took down as positive when she went to plug in the acceleration.

I looked at an elevator problem myself and for some reason I would tackle it completely differently and then I realize what this professor was thinking.

The "accelerating downwards" part meant that this is the NET acceleration.
 
  • #58
Not to pester, but just to help a bit (I used to tutor English to ESL students), the topic of your post uses "much" incorrectly.

Just recalling it off hand (there may be special cases I am not thinking of), it should be attached to a noun not an adjective, as in "much money," "much food," "much intelligence." A more natural sounding choice for English speakers would have been "very," i.e. "What to do if your professor is not very intelligent." or "What to do if your professor does not have much intelligence." (The 2nd one here sounds a little weird though.)

(Also, I'd note that the sentence sounds very insulting, I'm sure most people assumed you didn't mean it in such a harsh way or they would have said something about that... even though it seems well deserved in this case, haha.)

--Bob
 
  • #59
Hi Bob, thanks! English is not my first language, it's like a second language but still I can't express my thoughts that well.

Yes, I think the title is pretty harsh. I'll remember that... also the ''much'' + noun NOT adj.
 
Last edited:
  • #60
Headacheguy said:
Hi Bob, thanks! English is not my first language, but it's like a second language and still I can't express my thoughts that well.

Yes, I think the title is pretty harsh. I'll remember that... also the ''much'' + noun NOT adj.

Sorry for going off-topic, but out of curiosity, where are you from and what was your first language? Your English is pretty good, its at the same level as my second language (Chinese) and I've been studying for 12 years.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
970
  • · Replies 99 ·
4
Replies
99
Views
22K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
913
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K