What to do with a PhD in material science?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around career options for someone with a PhD in computational material science, currently in a postdoc position. The individual expresses uncertainty about future opportunities and considers transitioning to a different field. Participants suggest exploring job openings in industry, particularly in areas like multiscale materials problems, national labs, and private sector research. They emphasize that there are numerous programming jobs available, especially if minimal C++ skills are developed, with opportunities in sectors like finance, oil and gas, and logistics. The conversation highlights that while computer science professionals may excel, there is still a demand for individuals with a strong analytical background, and the job market is not as restrictive as initially perceived. Overall, the sentiment is optimistic regarding job prospects for someone with this academic background.
aihaike
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I got a PhD in computational material science (classical Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics).
I'm doing a postdoc but I wonder if I will keep going that way for my next position.
I've no idea about what to do afterward if I decide to do something else.
I do not know if there are really opportunities for someone with my profile.
I have some computer and programming skills but people from computer science do a better job I figure.

Does someone have any experience with a somehow "reconversion" from my field?

Thanks in advance,

Eric.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
Isn't multiscale problems in materials a hot area? Can't you find a position in a national lab or private sector doing materials research?
 
Thanks,

I did not know those links ...
I'll have a look.
 
comp_math said:
Isn't multiscale problems in materials a hot area? Can't you find a position in a national lab or private sector doing materials research?
well the hot area the domain of biology ...
I'm actually thinking about going to that way.

Is there really "private sector doing materials research" ?
Thank you for your reply.
 
aihaike said:
I got a PhD in computational material science (classical Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics).

If you develop some minimal c++ skills, there are a lot of programming jobs in private industry. Wall Street, oil and gas industry, logistics.

I do not know if there are really opportunities for someone with my profile.

Tons of them. Start with www.dice.com[/url] and [url]www.efinancialcareers.com[/URL]

[QUOTE]I have some computer and programming skills but people from computer science do a better job I figure.[/QUOTE]

No.

1) Just because you are a literature Ph.D. or even a brilliant literature Ph.D. doesn't mean that you can write decent novels. There are lots of CS people that really can't program. There are lots of people that can, but the two skills are correlated less than one would think.

2) algorthimic code requires some special skills

3) Even with the above, you need lots of warm bodies. If you have 10 million lines of code to babysit that means thousands of programming jobs. If you have this massive giant spawling system, then one genius is not going to be able to deal with this no matter brilliant they are. You want a thousand geniuses. Now since you probably can't get or couldn't afford a thousand geniuses, you probably will have to settle for five or six geniuses and a thousand reasonably intelligent people. Which is where you come in...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
twofish-quant said:
If you develop some minimal c++ skills, there are a lot of programming jobs in private industry. Wall Street, oil and gas industry, logistics.



Tons of them. Start with www.dice.com[/url] and [url]www.efinancialcareers.com[/URL]



No.

1) Just because you are a literature Ph.D. or even a brilliant literature Ph.D. doesn't mean that you can write decent novels. There are lots of CS people that really can't program. There are lots of people that can, but the two skills are correlated less than one would think.

2) algorthimic code requires some special skills

3) Even with the above, you need lots of warm bodies. If you have 10 million lines of code to babysit that means thousands of programming jobs. If you have this massive giant spawling system, then one genius is not going to be able to deal with this no matter brilliant they are. You want a thousand geniuses. Now since you probably can't get or couldn't afford a thousand geniuses, you probably will have to settle for five or six geniuses and a thousand reasonably intelligent people. Which is where you come in...[/QUOTE]
Thanks for your answer,

I really did not see it like that.
That's an interesting point of view.
Does that mean the world is mine?
I'm happy to see that this topic attracts more people that I thought.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
aihaike said:
That's an interesting point of view.
Does that mean the world is mine?

Not really. It does mean that you are unlikely to be poor and unemployed.
 
twofish-quant said:
Not really. It does mean that you are unlikely to be poor and unemployed.
year, I was just kidding.
It's very helpful.
Thanks
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
41
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top