What units should be used for the cauchy dispersion formula?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the correct unit conversions for the Cauchy dispersion formula, specifically the equation eta = A + B / w². The user initially misinterprets the units for the dispersion coefficient B, mistakenly converting it from micro-meters to square meters instead of keeping it in square micro-meters. The correct approach is to ensure that B is expressed in (μm)² and that the wavelength w is also in micro-meters, resulting in a unit-less index of refraction eta. The confusion arises from varying interpretations of the units used in different sources.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Cauchy dispersion formula
  • Familiarity with unit conversions, particularly between micro-meters and meters
  • Basic knowledge of index of refraction concepts
  • Ability to manipulate mathematical equations involving units
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Cauchy dispersion formula in detail, including its applications in optics
  • Study unit conversion techniques, focusing on micro-meters and square units
  • Learn about the significance of unit-less quantities in physics
  • Explore common pitfalls in unit conversions in scientific calculations
USEFUL FOR

Optics researchers, physics students, and engineers working with light propagation and material properties will benefit from this discussion.

spectral
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,

I would like to use the 'cauchy dispersion formula', ie (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy's_equation):[/PLAIN]

eta = A + B / w²

Where :
eta is the resulting IOR
A is the base IOR
B is the dispersion coefficient expressed in squarre meter (m²)
w is wavelength expressed in micro-meters

I try to apply this formula this way :
B = 0.013 in micro-meters,
A = 1.72

So first,
1) I convert the B parameter from micro-meter to m² : B = B / 1000000
2) I convert my wavelength from nm to micro-meter : wv = 500 / 1000

But the result I got seems incorrect, I got no dispersion !
Maybe there is a problem with my units ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
spectral said:
1) I convert the B parameter from micro-meter to m² : B = B * 1000000

I think you mean to convert B's units from m2 to (μm)2. For that, you have to multiply by 10000002, not 1000000.
 
Thanks for your answer,

But based on the formula here :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy's_equation[/PLAIN]

the C parameters (I use B instead) is expressed in micro-meters !

So, if C = 0.013 in micro-meters I have to convert it to meters to use the Cauchy formula...
... then I "divide" by 1000000² ?

Or there is something wrong in what I do or my units ?

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
By example, I should have :

eta = 1.72 + (0.013 / 1000000²) / 0.500²
 
OK, I see now. I didn't look at the Wikipedia page to see where the numbers came from before.

If your B (their C) is already in units of (μm)2, and you've converted your wavelength λ to μm, then the quantity B / λ2 = 0.013 / 0.52 has units of (μm)2/(μm)2, i.e. it's unit-less, as it should be because the index of refraction is unit-less. Why do you want to convert B to m2?
 
Last edited:
I see...

It is just that I have see somewhere that the C parameter has to be in m²... but it seems false !

Thanks for your help
 
spectral said:
I have see somewhere that the C parameter has to be in m²...

I suspect that they do their calculations using λ in meters.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K