What Volume of NaOH is Required for Back Titration in Simple Back Titration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Krushnaraj Pandya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Titration
AI Thread Summary
To determine the volume of NaOH required for back titration, 20 ml of decinormal HCl reacts with 10 ml of decinormal AgNO3, resulting in the precipitation of AgCl and leaving 10 ml of unreacted HCl. The discussion highlights the importance of considering all H+ ions present, as they must be neutralized to accurately assess the amount of Ag+ initially present. If only the remaining HCl is considered, 10 ml of NaOH would suffice, but this approach overlooks the formation of HNO3, which would require 20 ml of NaOH for neutralization. The consensus emphasizes that a proper back titration must account for all acidic components to ensure accurate results. Thus, the volume of NaOH needed depends on the complete neutralization of all acid present.
Krushnaraj Pandya
Gold Member
Messages
697
Reaction score
73

Homework Statement


20 ml of decinormal HCl soln. is added to 10 ml decinormal AgNO3 soln. AgCl is precipitated out and excess of acid was back titrated against a decinormal NaOH soln., What volume of NaOH was required for the back titration?

2. The attempt at a solution
10 ml HCl reacts with 10 ml AgNO3. 10 ml HCl is left. Now Do we consider HNO3 formed also, since then it'd require 20 ml NaOH. If we consider only HCl it'd be 10
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It hardly counts as a back titration, you are perfectly right that all H+ present initially have to be neutralized (which means there is no way of checking how much Ag+ was present).
 
Borek said:
It hardly counts as a back titration, you are perfectly right that all H+ present initially have to be neutralized (which means there is no way of checking how much Ag+ was present).
Ah! alright, thank you
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top