What was the speed of Sputnik I at its perigee?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the speed of Sputnik I at its perigee, using principles of energy conservation and angular momentum. Key parameters include its perigee and apogee distances, the mass of Earth, and gravitational constant. Participants emphasize the importance of applying conservation laws to derive equations that relate the velocities at both perigee and apogee. Confusion arises around the variables used, particularly regarding energy terms and the relevance of a spring constant, which is ultimately deemed unnecessary. The conversation concludes with one participant expressing confidence in finding the answer after clarifying the concepts discussed.
ChloeYip
Messages
93
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Sputnik I was launched into orbit around Earth in 1957. It had a perigee (the closest approach to
Earth, measured from Earth's center) of 6.81 × 106 m and an apogee (the furthest point from
Earth's center) of 7.53 × 106 m. What was its speed when it was at its perigee? The mass of Earth
is 5.97 × 1024 kg and G = 6.67 × 10- 11 N ∙ m2/kg2

Homework Equations


F=GMm/r2 F=mv2/r

The Attempt at a Solution


As energy is also conserved. mv(for perigee)/2-GMm/7.53*106=mv(for apogee)/2-GMm/6.81*106
But how can I find v(for apogee)? Thus v(for perigee)?
I can't find the MC answer which is 7840m/sSimilar thread:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/orbit-around-the-earth.867945/
http://www.enotes.com/homework-help/sputnik-was-launched-into-orbit-around-earth-1957-566404

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's another conservation law that will help here.
 
Angular momentum? L=rp=rmv
But still i need to find v for apogee... ehich i don't know how to get the answer avoiding this unknown variable...
 
Yes, angular momentum is conserved over the whole orbit. What does that tell you about the angular momentum at both apogee and perigee? Can you express that as an equation?
 
Can you determine the period of the orbit from what you are given? And if so, what does that give you?
 
gneill said:
Yes, angular momentum is conserved over the whole orbit. What does that tell you about the angular momentum at both apogee and perigee? Can you express that as an equation?

(a=apogee,p=perigee,r=radius,v=velosity)
ra x va = rp x vp
Right? Without vp, how to find va?
 
Janus said:
Can you determine the period of the orbit from what you are given? And if so, what does that give you?
T=2(pi)/(angular velosity) = 2(pi)r/(average v)?
 
ChloeYip said:
(a=apogee,p=perigee,r=radius,v=velosity)
ra x va = rp x vp
Right? Without vp, how to find va?
This gives you one relationship between va and vp. Energy conservation gives you another. Two equations, two unknowns.
 
ChloeYip said:
T=2(pi)/(angular velosity) = 2(pi)r/v?
Do you agree with this?
What is r and what is v?
Thanks
 
  • #10
ChloeYip said:
Do you agree with this?
What is r and what is v?
Thanks
If the orbit were circular then I'd agree. But the velocity and radius both vary over time for an elliptical orbit.

Use the conservation laws: energy and angular momentum.
 
  • #11
ChloeYip said:
Do you agree with this?
What is r and what is v?
Thanks
Not quite what I was looking for. There is a fairly direct way to get the answer to the problem, but it assumes some knowledge of the nature of orbits. I was trying to gauge just how much you knew about orbits in order to know in what direction to lead you in.
 
  • #12
gneill said:
Use the conservation laws: energy and angular momentum.
Angular momentum: Rmva=rmvp
Energy: 0.5ka^2 ; 0.5mv^2; -gMm/r => how should i arrange them?
Thanks

I have only little time left before my rxam is coming... hope you can tell me the sooner the better for me to try and understand them... thank you very much.
 
  • #13
ChloeYip said:
Angular momentum: Rmva=rmvp
Okay. Note that the m's can cancel.
Energy: 0.5ka^2 ; 0.5mv^2; -gMm/r => how should i arrange them?
Apply energy conservation for the two orbit locations.
 
  • #14
I know i should use energy conservation... but how to arrange them? If 0.5k(ap)^2+0.5m(vp)^2+gMm/r=0.5K(aa)^2+0.5m(va)^2+GMm/r
How come there are so many variable?! Am i having something wrong?
So how can i arrange them?
Thanks...

(Only little time left from test...)
 
  • #15
ChloeYip said:
I know i should use energy conservation... but how to arrange them? If 0.5k(ap)^2+0.5m(vp)^2+gMm/r=0.5K(aa)^2+0.5m(va)^2+GMm/r
How come there are so many variable?! Am i having something wrong?
I don't know what your "k" terms are meant to represent. What type of energy do they correspond to? What is k?

You need to get your signs right for the gravitational potential energy. Gravitational potential energy in this context takes its reference point at infinite distance, so its sign is always negative.

You have two given locations, apogee and perigee, for which you have separate orbit radii. Be sure to identify them in your equation with separate variable names.
 
  • #16
K is spring constant, as such the planet is oscillating like a spring
It is correspond to elastic potential energy
 
  • #17
ChloeYip said:
K is spring constant, as such the planet is oscillating like a spring
It is correspond to elastic potential energy
There's no spring here. The "spring" action of the orbit is accounted for by the trading of gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy.
 
  • #18
ChloeYip said:
K is spring constant, as such the planet is oscillating like a spring
It is correspond to elastic potential energy
To the extent that the satellite oscillates in its orbit, it is a result of the gravitational attraction term you already have in the equation, not from some mysterious piece of elastic tethering it to Baikonur.
Besides, gravitation follows an inverse square law of attraction, while elastic follows a linear law.
 
  • Like
Likes ChloeYip
  • #19
haruspex said:
To the extent that the satellite oscillates in its orbit, it is a result of the gravitational attraction term you already have in the equation, not from some mysterious piece of elastic tethering it to Baikonur.
Besides, gravitation follows an inverse square law of attraction, while elastic follows a linear law.

Thank you very much.
I can find the answer now.
 
Back
Top