What Was the Take-Off Speed of the Long Jumper?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dmkeddy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the take-off speed of a long jumper who leaves the ground at a 30-degree angle and travels 8.90 meters. Participants clarify that the vertical distance traveled is not zero, emphasizing the need to account for vertical height in the calculations. The vertical motion is divided into ascent and descent phases, with gravity affecting the jumper's vertical speed. The horizontal distance is known, but without the flight time, the problem primarily hinges on understanding the vertical components of motion. Ultimately, the key to solving the problem lies in accurately applying the equations of motion for both vertical and horizontal trajectories.
dmkeddy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An athlete executing a long jump leaves the ground at an angle of 30 degrees and travels 8.90m. What was the take-off speed?

Homework Equations



d(vertical)=(vi)(t) + 0.5at^2

The Attempt at a Solution



0=Vsin30t + (0.5)(-9.8)(t^2)

I cannot solve for two separate variables, how can I solve this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EDIT: I see what you've done.

Right, in your attempt, d does not equal 0. There has to be some vertical height.

For horizontal you know:

d = 8.9m

For vertical you know:

a = -9.8 for the ascent and 9.8 for the descent.

You know vf for the ascent = 0 and vi for the descent = 0.
 
Last edited:
that is the vertical, there is no horizontal acceleration
Vertical:
Vi=?
Vf=?
a=-9.8m/s^2
t=?
d=0

Horizontal:
Vave=?
t=?
d=8.90m
 
dmkeddy said:
that is the vertical, there is no horizontal acceleration
Vertical:

d=0

d does not equal 0. There has to be vertical height.

The vertical phase is split in two. See previous post for details.

Unless you know the flight time, this question all comes down to the vertical components.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top