What Went Wrong in Solving the Energy Equation Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ut Prosim
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the energy equation problem for a block sliding up a ramp under the influence of an applied force and friction. Participants identify errors in the initial calculations, particularly in how work done by friction and the applied force were accounted for in the energy equation. The correct approach involves calculating the net force on the block, which includes the effects of the applied force on the normal force and friction. A consensus emerges that these adjustments lead to the correct maximum height of the block, which is 0.249 m. The importance of using consistent variable notation and LaTeX for clarity is also emphasized.
Ut Prosim
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The 10kg block has an initial velocity of 2m/s at the bottom of the ramp and slides up the ramp with a constant applied horizontal force F=75N as shown. Find the maximum height h that the block can reach on the ramp.

We're using cos(theta/%)=.8 & sin(theta/%)=.6

help-1.jpg


m=10kg | V1=2m/s | F=75N | Y2=? | Y1=0 | coefficient of friction(#)= .4

Homework Equations



K1 + Ug1+ Ue1+ W'1-2= K2 + Ug2 + Ue2

The Attempt at a Solution



K1= .5m(V1)2 V1=2 ==20
K2= .5m(V2)2 V2=0 ==0
Ug1= mgY1 Y1=0 ==0
Ug2= mgY2 = 98Y2

(elastics are 0)

W'1-2
= WF+Wf
= [-#*mgcos(%)*(y2/sin(%))] + [Fcos(%)*(Y2/sin(%))]
=[(-.4)(10)(9.8)(.8)*(Y2/.6)] + [(75)(.8)*(Y2/.6)]
=47.733Y2Energy Equation:

20+0+0+47.733Y2 = 0 + 98Y2 + 0
Y2=.398
BUT the answer is .249m.

If you could review my work, and help me find out where I went wrong, it would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well... I don't get your answer, and I also don't get 0.249 m. The difference between my answer and yours comes from the energy equation and they way work is calculated. It looks like in your equation, the work done by friction helps and the work done by the external force hurts...

But like I said, I still don't get 0.249 m. It's always possible that I'm doing something wrong, too:smile:.

Also, it helps to use LaTeX for readability (it's hard to look at % and #... especially when you know it could be \theta and \mu). I might be nitpicking, but I also like to use the same variables that you're given in the problem. If it asks you to solve for h, why change it to Y_{2}?

-Kerry
 
The work done by friction hurts, hence it has negative mu . I just have them switched in the addition problem above.

I have no clue what LaTeX is, although I see when I try to copy and paste your mu, LaTeX Code: \\mu, it shows up as an odd code. I'm new to these forums and have not been introduced to this character code.
 
I don't think you have enough terms. Also I think solving for the distance up the ramp is the way to go and then figure the h after you know how far up it goes.

To do this figure the net force on the block on the ramp:

Total-F = Applied-F*Cosθ - mg*sinθ - Friction-F

First determine what's happening with the first 2 forces.

75*.8 - 98*.6 = 1.2 N - friction

Now Friction is

μ*(75*sinθ + 98*cosθ) = .4(75*.6 + 98*.8) = 49.36

Net Force then = 1.2 - 49.36 = -48.16

From your force now you have the deceleration and can figure the distance by

V2 = 2*a*x

Then just figure h from x.
 
Ut Prosim said:
The work done by friction hurts, hence it has negative mu . I just have them switched in the addition problem above.

I have no clue what LaTeX is, although I see when I try to copy and paste your mu, LaTeX Code: \\mu, it shows up as an odd code. I'm new to these forums and have not been introduced to this character code.

Ah, yes, I believe you're right. I mis-read your post.

For LaTeX help, click on the \Sigma to the right of the array of buttons when you're postion.

LowlyPion found our mistake (I made the same one you did...): We didn't include the effect of the applied force F on the normal force when we calculated the friction force. If you do that, you should get the right answer (the same one you'd get with LowlyPion's method).

-Kerry
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top