What Were the Historical Breakthroughs in Understanding Force and Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pgardn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Idea
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the historical breakthroughs in understanding force applied over a distance, particularly the concept of kinetic energy. Leibniz's definition of "vis viva" as mv^2 marked a significant advancement, suggesting conservation of energy and linking it to friction. The relationship between force and distance was later recognized by scientists like Joule, who observed that vis viva correlated with work done in heat engines. The conversation highlights the fragmented nature of scientific progress, with many contributors rather than a single figure consolidating these ideas. Overall, the understanding of force and energy evolved through the contributions of various thinkers over time.
pgardn
Messages
656
Reaction score
2
I have been trying to figure out historically how Force applied over a distance was found to be a conceptual breakthrough. I know about Joule and some others, and their thoughts on the idea of energy. But I cannot find out who or what people actually came up with the notion that Force applied over a distance was such a useful concept. Did Newton say anything about this idea being meaningful? I am looking for the historically origins of this idea and I can't find out much as far as the math goes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Definitely by the time of Helmholtz, there was an understanding that force times distance caused a change in energy.

What actually happened (as I understand it) was that kinetic energy was the first real breakthrough. In particular, Leibiz defined "vis viva" for an object of mass m and speed v as mv^2 (without the 1/2). Leibniz said that vis viva was conserved and even postulated that friction was caused by the spreading of vis viva to random other stuff.

It was observed by those working with heat engines etc (like Joule) that an initial amount of vis viva led to differing amounts of "work done" and I guess they found that this makes since if "work done" means force times distance.

By the was this is a little speculative, so don't trust me too much.
 
Ja4Coltrane said:
Definitely by the time of Helmholtz, there was an understanding that force times distance caused a change in energy.

What actually happened (as I understand it) was that kinetic energy was the first real breakthrough. In particular, Leibiz defined "vis viva" for an object of mass m and speed v as mv^2 (without the 1/2). Leibniz said that vis viva was conserved and even postulated that friction was caused by the spreading of vis viva to random other stuff.

It was observed by those working with heat engines etc (like Joule) that an initial amount of vis viva led to differing amounts of "work done" and I guess they found that this makes since if "work done" means force times distance.

By the was this is a little speculative, so don't trust me too much.

I had read about this. And a bunch of other people but it was sort of rag-tag. I was trying to find out if anyone had actually thought about Leibniz mv^2 and put that together with what Newton had already gathered. I can't find anything clear from one person, so it might be just the usual science, a whole bunch of people contributing different parts. Not like Maxwell putting it all together or Newton in a clean mathematical way.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top