What will show scale inside rocket?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maciej Ma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rocket Scale
Maciej Ma
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
lab_space.jpg


I want to kindly ask about opinion what will be if :

a) rocket's speed < gravitation
b) rocket's speed > gravitation

************************************************************
Earth ----- Rocket[W]m >>> constant V
lab_ground.gif

[W]- scale can measure kg
[m]- person mass

Scale is showing Qearth + Qrocket

Qearth - gravitation between person and Earth (Newton's grav. force )
Qrocket - gravitation between person and rocket (Newton's grav. force)
*****************************************************

Rocket[W]m >>>>> constant acceleration
lab_space.jpg


Rocket[W]m ----------------> G<V< C

G - gravitation speed in Vacuum , C- light's speed

Scale is showing Af + Qrocket
Af - acceleration forces ( rocket's engine work give constant a )
Qrocket - gravitation between person and rocket ( Newton's gravitation )

Qrocket = 0 WHY ?

Mach- first engineer who described Supersonic Speed problem

( please look on 4 animations below link (left side of page )

V= zero , V>0 , V= sound , V>sound //1,4 Mach

http://www.acs.psu.edu/drussell/Demos/doppler/doppler.htmlWhat will show scale if body m is moving faster than own gravitation ?

Rocket represent mass M
Person represent mass m

M---r----m ----------> G<V

Mass M is sending (EM) waves but waves can not touch the mass m
mass m is going faster than own signals

what will show scale ?

M---r----m ----------> G<V

M---r----m ----------> V <G More better is showingbproblem below example

P1...Sun-----------Earth ------> cnstant VP1............SUN -----------Earth >>>> constant acceleration

Sun Was in past in Point 1 . Sun started gravitation signal in P1 .

Please add to above Inverted Square Law.

How big Intensity will feel Earth ? Haw far from P1 Earth will register signal that started in P1 ?

please compare 5-6 minutes ----> constant motion situation

to 5-6 minutes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cnastant acceleration situation

1930 Tolman surface brightness test
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tolman_surface_brightness_test
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming that nothing on the scale changes, the only thing that will vary the reading of the scale is the acceleration (not the speed!) of the rocket relative to some nearby object in free fall. That will be true in all the cases you describe above, and is the only thing you need to know to analyze them all.

You mention the "speed of gravity" several times. There's no such thing; the gravitational field is already spread through all of space so no matter how far and fast you move, the gravitational field will already be there.

(So far there's no relativity in these problems - it's all classical mechanics)
 
m1-----r----mass M ----r-------m2 >>>>motion
.....Fire

Fire = that mass is changing temp.

m1 or m2 will feel more faster
that mass M is changing power of own gravitation ?

please imagine opposite direction <<<

please add to above model CONSTANT ACCELERATION !
( distance r = 1 meter or 1000 meters or 150 000 000 km )

how much time need light for distance r = 1m
how much time need light for distance r = 1000 m

how much time need gravitation to inform mass m 1 ,m2 about problem ?

To help You more
please imagine that m1,m2 are perpendicular to motion >>>

30 km/s ? ... 220 km/s
respect to what ? please read about TOLMAN test 1930 ? ( apparent position !)
 
Last edited:
Maciej Ma said:
I want to kindly ask about opinion what will be if :

a) rocket's speed < gravitation
b) rocket's speed > gravitation

I see you've got some answers already, but I find it hard to guess what you might even mean by a) and b) above.

Speed we can measure in units of velocity (meters/second for example). I'm not aware of any definition of "gravitation" that has compatible units.

And to compare quantites they must have compatible units.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top