What Will the Clock Read at the Turnaround Point in the Twins Paradox?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Al68
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stupid
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the twins paradox, specifically focusing on the scenario involving a third observer at the turnaround point of the traveling twin's journey. Participants explore the implications of clock synchronization and the readings of clocks from different frames of reference, particularly when the ship is traveling at a significant fraction of the speed of light (0.8c) over a distance of 8 light-years.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant, Al, asks what the clock of a third observer, synchronized with the twins' clocks at departure, would read at the turnaround point.
  • Another participant questions whether the synchronization of the third observer's clock with the Earthbound twin's clock follows Einstein's convention and emphasizes the need to select a coordinate chart for calculations.
  • There is a repeated emphasis on the importance of choosing an appropriate inertial coordinate chart for the calculations, suggesting that the Earth-centered chart may be the simplest option.
  • Participants express a desire to assist Al in gaining experience with the calculations rather than providing direct answers, indicating a focus on the learning process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no clear consensus on the specific readings of the clocks or the calculations involved, as participants are engaged in a discussion that involves multiple perspectives on synchronization and reference frames.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not resolved the assumptions regarding the choice of coordinate charts or the implications of clock synchronization according to different conventions, leaving these aspects open for further exploration.

Al68
If we add a third observer to the twins paradox at the turnaround point (at rest with earth), and with a clock that was synched with the other two when the ship left earth, what will that clock read when this third observer sees the ship turn around?

Assuming v= 0.8c, distance = 8 ly.

Also, since this third observer and the ship's twin could look at each other's clocks (locally), what would each observe the other's clock to read?

Thanks,
Al
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Al68 said:
If we add a third observer to the twins paradox at the turnaround point (at rest with earth), and with a clock that was synched with the other two when the ship left earth,
Do you mean... the third observer and the Earthbound twin have synchronized their clocks according to Einstein's convention? Or equivalently, measuring simultaneity relative to an inertial coordinate chart where both the third observer and Earthbound twin are stationary, their clocks read the same value at the same (coordinate) time?

what will that clock read when this third observer sees the ship turn around?
Just choose a coordinate chart and compute! (An inertial coordinate chart centered on Earth is probably the simplest)

Assuming v= 0.8c, distance = 8 ly.
As measured by what coordinate chart?

Also, since this third observer and the ship's twin could look at each other's clocks (locally), what would each observe the other's clock to read?
Again, just select coordinates and compute!


In what way are you having trouble making the calculations?
 
Hurkyl said:
Do you mean... the third observer and the Earthbound twin have synchronized their clocks according to Einstein's convention? Or equivalently, measuring simultaneity relative to an inertial coordinate chart where both the third observer and Earthbound twin are stationary, their clocks read the same value at the same (coordinate) time?


Just choose a coordinate chart and compute! (An inertial coordinate chart centered on Earth is probably the simplest)


As measured by what coordinate chart?


Again, just select coordinates and compute!


In what way are you having trouble making the calculations?

Thanks for your thoughtful and complete answers to my questions.

Al
 
Al68 said:
Thanks for your thoughtful and complete answers to my questions.
You're welcome. But I did not intend to give a complete answer, but instead help you take this opportunity to gain experience through doing the problem (or to help correct whatever was preventing you from being able to do so, if appropriate). I apologize for denying you that opportunity, and will try harder to avoid spoiling the next problem.
 
Hurkyl said:
You're welcome. But I did not intend to give a complete answer, but instead help you take this opportunity to gain experience through doing the problem (or to help correct whatever was preventing you from being able to do so, if appropriate). I apologize for denying you that opportunity, and will try harder to avoid spoiling the next problem.

Oh, don't worry, you didn't deny me that opportunity. After all, I had that opportunity before I ever posted. So don't worry, your detailed answers didn't spoil it for me.

Al
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 115 ·
4
Replies
115
Views
9K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
7K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K