What will the wave velocity be in this string?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the wave velocity in a string with a specified tension and dimensions. The initial calculation yielded a wave velocity of 89.534 m/s, but discrepancies arose regarding the expected value of 50 m/s. Participants identified errors in the tension conversion and mass per unit length calculations, leading to a corrected velocity of 283.13 m/s. The frequency of the string's vibration was clarified to be a harmonic of 50 Hz, specifically the 8th harmonic, resulting in a calculated velocity of 100 m/s. Ultimately, the problem presents inconsistencies between the provided data and the expected outcomes.
Zakiyah Afrin
Messages
8
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement

What will be the wave velocity, if a string of 100 cm length is in a 10 kg-wt tension forms 9 nodes when vibrated and becomes symphonic to a 50 Hz tuning fork. Given, Cross sectional area of string, $$A=4.95 mm^2$$ & density, $$d = 0.25 g/cc$$?

Homework Equations

$$ V=\sqrt{\dfrac{T}{m}} $$

m= mass per unit length

T = Tension in string


The Attempt at a Solution


Velocity in a string
$$ V=\sqrt{\dfrac{T}{m}} $$
Where,

Tension in string, $$T= 10\times9.8=98 kN$$
mass per unit length, $$m= \frac{v \times d}{L}=A\times d= 0.012225 kg/m $$
So,$$V = 89.534 m/s$$
.Now the problem is answer should be equal to 50 m/s . Is there any effect of tuning fork on the wave velocity of the string ?​
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Zakiyah Afrin and welcome to PF.

Mass is density multiplied by volume, not density multiplied by cross sectional area. To find the volume, you need the length of the string. How can you find an expression for that?
 
  • Like
Likes Zakiyah Afrin
I mean mass per unit length i.e $$m= \frac{v \times d}{L}=A\times d$$
 
And what do you get with this correction?

On Edit: Actually, yes m = A d is correct for "mass per unit length". I interpreted "m" as total mass. What do you get for this in units of kilograms per meter?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Zakiyah Afrin
kuruman said:
And what do you get with this correction?
no I calculated in right way. May be there Is something with the frequency
 
You appear to have made some mistakes. When you say
##T= 10\times9.8=98 kN## this is not correct. ##T= 10\times9.8=98 N##. ##1~kN=1000~N##. That's minor. You seem to have used 98 N in your calculation so no harm done.
You seem to have made some error in your calculation for ##d##. When you convert 0.25 g/cc, remember that 1 g = 10-3 kg and 1 cc = 10-6 m3.
Now for the important part. You are given the tension ##T##, and enough information to find the linear density ##\mu## (I prefer to use ##m## for total mass). Then it should be a straightforward calculation to find the velocity using ##v=\sqrt{T/\mu}## which is what you attempted. The problem is that if you put in the correct values for ##T## and ##\mu##, you do not get 50 m/s.

However, if you completely ignore the tension and the linear density and assume that "becomes symphonic to a 50 Hz tuning fork" means that the vibrating frequency of the string is a harmonic of 50 Hz (which one?) you can get 50 Hz (how?)

This problem bothers me because the sets of information it provides appear to be internally inconsistent.
 
  • Like
Likes Zakiyah Afrin
kuruman said:
And what do you get with this correction?

On Edit: Actually, yes m = A d is correct for "mass per unit length". I interpreted "m" as total mass. What do you get for this in units of kilograms per meter?
as I mentioned 0.01225
 
Zakiyah Afrin said:
as I mentioned 0.01225
Repeating the number, does not help if you do not show what went in the calculation. Your number is 10 times what it should be. Also, be sure to include units every time you quote a number. It's a good habit. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Zakiyah Afrin
Sorry, I did lot of mistakes.
F=98 N
μ=0.001225 kg/m
v= 283.13 m/s
T= 98 N
but frequency for this becomes
141.57 Hz
 
  • #10
Zakiyah Afrin said:
Sorry, I did lot of mistakes.
F=98 N
μ=0.001225 kg/m
v= 283.13 m/s
T= 98 N
but frequency for this becomes
141.57 Hz
Yes, that's what I got when I used ##v=\sqrt{T/\mu}##. Please read post #6. You can find v = 50 m/s if you use v = λ f, but you need to find λ and f separately. Hint: f is not 50 Hz but a harmonic of 50 Hz.
 
  • Like
Likes Zakiyah Afrin
  • #11
kuruman said:
Yes, that's what I got when I used ##v=\sqrt{T/\mu}##. Please read post #6. You can find v = 50 m/s if you use v = λ f, but you need to find λ and f separately. Hint: f is not 50 Hz but a harmonic of 50 Hz.
since, no. of nodes = 9
so it will be 8th harmonic I guess n= 8
f = n f0=8*50=400 Hz
λ = 2*L/n=1/4m
$$v=f λ=400*1/4=100 ms^{-1}$$
but not 50 m\s
 
  • #12
How do you get harmonics from nodes? How many nodes does the fundamental ##n=1## have? Draw a picture if you must.
 
  • Like
Likes Zakiyah Afrin
  • #13
kuruman said:
How do you get harmonics from nodes? How many nodes does the fundamental ##n=1## have? Draw a picture if you must.

upload_2018-10-8_10-6-33.png

for n= 1 number of nodes = 2
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-10-8_10-6-33.png
    upload_2018-10-8_10-6-33.png
    325 bytes · Views: 410
  • #14
I have a different counting scheme that excludes the ends, but that's OK as long as you know what you mean. In that case I agree with calculation of 100 m/s in post #11. Unless I misunderstand what "becomes symphonic" means, I don't see how one gets 50 m/s.
 
  • #15
Then, there is a question fault right ?
 
  • #16
Yes. Whether the v = 100 m/s or 50 m/s it is still incompatible with the tension and the linear density.
 
Back
Top