What would a universe with two time dimensions be like?

  • B
  • Thread starter Jupiter60
  • Start date
  • #1
Jupiter60
73
20
Just what would a universe be like if it had two time dimensions?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
1,440
424
How would you generalize equations of motion? What would the action principle look like?
 
  • #3
OmCheeto
Gold Member
2,250
2,696
Just what would a universe be like if it had two time dimensions?
hmmm....
I've heard about something called "spooky at a distance".
I do not understand it at all, but from what I've heard, it seems to violate "my" notion of our one dimension of time.
Perhaps we already have two time dimensions.

hmmmm.... Perhaps this thread belongs in the sci-fi section.
 
  • #4
JorisL
492
189
The idea of two time directions is sometimes used in string theory/supergravity.
A paper by Itzhak Bars http://de.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9809034
And more recent results can be found at INSPIRE

I'm not sure how interesting it is but it does exist (in 12 dimensions or more)
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
  • #5
arivero
Gold Member
3,394
120
I'm not sure how interesting it is but it does exist (in 12 dimensions or more)

For the sake of discussion, I would like to see how it works with two macroscopic time dimensions and flat space, with minkowsky product coming from the matrix diag(1,1,1,-1,-1).
 
  • Like
Likes maline and fresh_42
  • #6
JorisL
492
189
I have absolutely no idea, I encountered a mention of it in a master thesis (and some articles I believe).
Maybe some day I'll find the time to check it out.
 
  • #7
fresh_42
Mentor
Insights Author
2021 Award
17,241
17,234
I have absolutely no idea, I encountered a mention of it in a master thesis (and some articles I believe).
Maybe some day I'll find the time to check it out.
Where's the problem is a macroscopic diag(1,1,1,-1,-1) world?
 
  • #8
JorisL
492
189
Nothing from a mathematical point of view, I figure the physics would look quite different.

A guess would be that consistency of dimensional reductions can do some weird things.
I'm only a little aware of the consistency of those procedures so I have to look into it on Monday since the document that might give me a hint whether more time directions mess things up is in my dorm room.
 
  • #9
arivero
Gold Member
3,394
120
What would the action principle look like?

For a classical non-relativistic particle, it seems that instead of conditions in two extremes [a,b] in the time-line we should impose them in a circle of the time-"plane".
 
  • #10
fresh_42
Mentor
Insights Author
2021 Award
17,241
17,234
For a classical non-relativistic particle, it seems that instead of conditions in two extremes [a,b] in the time-line we should impose them in a circle of the time-"plane".
Even if we get the geometry somehow explained, what about entropy?
 
  • #11
Markus Hanke
259
45
From a purely mathematical point of view, having an additional time dimension would fundamentally change the form of the general wave equation, turning it into what I believe is called an "ultra-hyperbolic equation" ( correct me on this if I'm wrong ). The question then becomes how the solutions to this equation behave under a given set of initial values - for example, in a theory of electromagnetism in (3+2) dimensions, do we still get a nice, well behaved wave solution, or do we get something that evolves chaotically ? Or worse still, would we be faced with a situation where no general solution even exists ?

I am not qualified to answer any of this ( not having studied this type of PDE ), but I would also be interested to hear what the mathematicians here have to say on this. My intuition tells me that things won't work out nicely if you add an extra ( macroscopic ) time dimension, but I may well be wrong. And then of course there is the option of having the extra dimension compactified.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
  • #13
For the sake of discussion, I would like to see how it works with two macroscopic time dimensions and flat space, with minkowsky product coming from the matrix diag(1,1,1,-1,-1).

Well, for one you'd have trivially easily occurring closed timelike curves.
 
  • #14
Demystifier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
12,933
5,236
From a purely mathematical point of view, having an additional time dimension would fundamentally change the form of the general wave equation, turning it into what I believe is called an "ultra-hyperbolic equation" ( correct me on this if I'm wrong ). The question then becomes how the solutions to this equation behave under a given set of initial values - for example, in a theory of electromagnetism in (3+2) dimensions, do we still get a nice, well behaved wave solution, or do we get something that evolves chaotically ? Or worse still, would we be faced with a situation where no general solution even exists ?

I am not qualified to answer any of this ( not having studied this type of PDE ), but I would also be interested to hear what the mathematicians here have to say on this. My intuition tells me that things won't work out nicely if you add an extra ( macroscopic ) time dimension, but I may well be wrong. And then of course there is the option of having the extra dimension compactified.
The Cauchy problem is not well posed for such spacetime signatures. See e.g.
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9702052
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9901045
 
  • Like
Likes maline, JorisL and arivero
  • #16
arivero
Gold Member
3,394
120
privileged character.

We could try some list of priviledged D = d + t combinations. To start with, let me note the classical signatures to have susy and other stuff related to division algebras:
R: d - t = 1
C: d - t = 2 This is our spacetime, 3-1=2
H: d - t = 4
O: d - t = 8. I think this is the 9-1 = 8 of string theory and perhaps the 10 - 2 mentioned by JorisL above
I am not sure if there is some mod8 periodicity here or the list just stops at 8.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
  • #18
Qcontinuum
5
1
For the more interested in 2 k, 4 n as 6 dimensional model you should look at Itzhak Bars work. He has interesting stringy ideas. Gravitational constant looks normal for observer but is a "shadow" of a dilaton field. He worked on many examples with many interpretations and seems to get a consistent framework for a working theory.
Here one impressing work as you see the mathematical beauty in it.
http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.1585
 
  • #19
haushofer
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2,640
1,107
The idea of two time directions is sometimes used in string theory/supergravity.
A paper by Itzhak Bars http://de.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9809034
And more recent results can be found at INSPIRE

I'm not sure how interesting it is but it does exist (in 12 dimensions or more)
Isn't that related to the fact that AdS-space can be described as being embedded in Minkowski spacetime with two timelike directions? (the AdS group is SO(D-2,2) )
 
  • #20
JorisL
492
189
Seems like a good starting point to look at.
Maybe if I can find some time in the next couple of weeks I'll look into it.

This seems like the idea that underlies the arxiv-notes I linked.
The formalism is a simple ##Sp(2, R)## gauge theory for particles ##X^M (\tau )## (zero-branes) which arises from a basic idea as follows. ##Sp(2, R)## is the automorphism symmetry of the quantum relations ##[x, p] = i## and treats ##(x, p)## as a doublet. The idea is to turn this global symmetry of Quantum Mechanics
into a local symmetry of a theory. The 3-parameter local symmetry ##Sp(2, R)## includes ##\tau##-reparametrizations as one of its local transformations, and therefore it can be regarded as a generalization of gravity on the worldline. The ##Sp(2, R)## gauge theory is non-trivial and physically consistent only if the zero
brane has two timelike coordinates ##X^0(\tau)##, ##X^{0\prime}(\tau)## in target space, and has a global symmetry SO(d, 2), which is the Lorentz group with two times.

I'm not well-versed in the terminology of a "target space" so I'm not sure this would lead to the AdS group?
Neither what ##d## means in this context, from the abstract it follows that ##D## is the number of spacetime dimensions.
 
  • #21
ohwilleke
Gold Member
2,020
843
Just what would a universe be like if it had two time dimensions?

Flat (in the sense of lacking height, not necessarily topologically) and timeless, or one dimensional motion in space up and down a single line with time.
 
  • #22
rootone
3,393
946
There could be no causality as we think of it, so no meaningful predictions of anything could be made.
Starting at event 'A', the following event 'B' could be any number of different things depending on the trajectory which an observer is travelling through the 2D time.
It would be possible to travel in a circular fashion through time, so that one could return to the exact same circumstances as 'last week' just by waiting.
 
  • #23
maline
436
69
Starting at event 'A', the following event 'B' could be any number of different things depending on the trajectory which an observer is travelling through the 2D time.
It would be possible to travel in a circular fashion through time, so that one could return to the exact same circumstances as 'last week' just by waiting.
If a set of physical laws could be described at all, they would impose local or global constraints on variables over the manifold. We could, for instance, define two orthogonal time directions as "positive", and look for laws where events depend only on regions with lower values for both coordinates. An observer at any point would "remember" such a two dimensional region, rather than a trajectory. This would rule out circular causation.
 
  • #24
ohwilleke
Gold Member
2,020
843
Flat (in the sense of lacking height, not necessarily topologically) and timeless, or one dimensional motion in space up and down a single line with time.

Apologies for not carefully reading "two <i>time</i> dimensions" as opposed to merely two dimensions. I wouldn't have been so flip if I had read more carefully.
 
  • #25
naima
Gold Member
938
54
Haven't 3 timelike directions in a black hole?
 
  • #26
Ben Niehoff
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,887
168
Haven't 3 timelike directions in a black hole?
No. Black hole spacetimes are globally Lorentzian; i.e., with one timelike direction.

In the Schwarzschild spacetime, for example, the timelike/spacelike nature of the coordinates t and r exchange roles as the horizon is crossed (note that the angular coordinates don't participate!); however, this is merely a coordinate artifact, and one can write the Schwarzschild metric in coordinates which are globally smooth across the horizon, with manifest globally Lorentzian signature (cf. Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates, or Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates).
 

Suggested for: What would a universe with two time dimensions be like?

Replies
2
Views
270
Replies
0
Views
515
Replies
2
Views
868
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
557
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
61
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
506
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
862
Replies
1
Views
82
Top