What Would Happen if the Earth Was Flat and There Was No Gravity?

AI Thread Summary
In a hypothetical scenario where the Earth is flat and gravity does not exist, an observer accelerating upwards at 1g would perceive a dropped pen as accelerating downwards, despite it maintaining its speed. This situation mirrors the principles of general relativity, where distinguishing between acceleration and gravity can be challenging. The discussion raises skepticism about the motivations behind such questions, suggesting they may align with flat Earth advocacy. Participants emphasize that the current understanding of Earth suffices without needing to entertain flat Earth theories. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of physics and the implications of acceleration versus gravity.
samtheham
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If the Earth was flat, and there were no such thing as gravity, and it, along with all the celestial bodies, accelerated upwards (so, parallel to normal) at 1g(9.8m/s^2), what would happen if I dropped a pen while I am on earth?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The pen would maintain it's current speed.
 
gravity

So, it'd still seem that gravity existed, right?
 
no,the pen wouldn't accelerate therefore,it wudnt seem as if gravity existed
 
For a casual observer who is accellerating with this flat earth, the pen would appear to be accellerating down.
But that is because the observer is accustomed to being accelerated upwards by the Earth under his feet, not because the pen actually is going down.
 
You could actually do an experiment and determine that you were accelerating and the pen was the "inertial frame". However, I would have to ask the question: why would you ask this question? It almost seems like something the Flat Earth Society would do to try and get a bunch of "physicists" to support their views.
 
I have the same suspicion as StatMechGuy.

Zz.
 
So harsh guys! This is the legitimate basis of general relativity. It would be very difficult to distinguish this kind of acceleration from "gravity" (you'd need to compare measurements from separated places, much as were used the first time to show we don't live in a discworld).
 
cesiumfrog said:
So harsh guys! This is the legitimate basis of general relativity. It would be very difficult to distinguish this kind of acceleration from "gravity" (you'd need to compare measurements from separated places, much as were used the first time to show we don't live in a discworld).

Yeah, but one doesn't need to do that on a "flat" earth! An ordinary Earth that we have right now is pretty sufficient, don't you think?

Furthermore, I don't think we were being "harsh". All I said was I had a "suspicion". It wasn't an accusation. If I think truly believe this is nothing more than a flat-earth advocacy, do you think this thread would have survived till now?

Zz.
 
Back
Top