What would happen if the sun was hit by a gamma ray burst?

AI Thread Summary
A gamma ray burst (GRB) occurring near the sun, such as one 6.7 light years away, would not significantly impact the sun itself, as it is already a massive source of radiation. The sun primarily emits radiation in forms other than gamma rays, and any gamma rays produced would be absorbed in its core before being re-emitted at lower energy levels. Concerns about the sun reflecting gamma rays toward Earth are unfounded, as the sun's structure prevents such reflection. Additionally, the sun would not produce a solar flare in response to a GRB, as its radiation output is a continuous process. Overall, the sun is well-equipped to handle radiation without being adversely affected by a distant gamma ray burst.
Nash Su
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Now I am wondering what would happen to the sun if it was hit by the nearest gamma ray burst (I believe the nearest one is 6.7 Light years away). Now I understand that a gamma ray burst is going to be more radiation than what the sun produces in its lifetime. I also know that the sun is just one big massive ball of radiation and gamma rays.

Now I hear that it will do nothing to the sun because the sun is already highly radiated by the rays. But what if the sun reflects some of the rays towards, let us say, Earth. Is it possible for that to happen? If not reflect then would the sun just give another solar flare out into space to level out the radiation?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Nash Su said:
Now I am wondering what would happen to the sun if it was hit by the nearest gamma ray burst (I believe the nearest one is 6.7 Light years away). Now I understand that a gamma ray burst is going to be more radiation than what the sun produces in its lifetime. I also know that the sun is just one big massive ball of radiation and gamma rays.

What are you referring to. There have been no GRB's anywhere close to the Sun. (Or even our galaxy) Also, the Sun is an oblate spheroid consisting mostly of a plasma of protons and electrons with a small amount of other elements. It is true that radiation is being radiated out from the core through the rest of the star and out into space, but the vast majority of this radiation is not gamma rays. Gamma rays are quickly absorbed in the core where they are re-emitted and absorbed again and again until the radiation has dropped off out of the gamma ray range.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top