What's a Good Beginner's Physics Book?

AI Thread Summary
For those preparing to study physics at university, selecting the right foundational texts is crucial. A recommended starting point for a conceptual understanding is "Conceptual Physics" by Paul G. Hewitt, which provides a solid grasp of fundamental concepts without heavy mathematical detail. For a more rigorous approach that includes algebraic manipulation, the "Physics" series by Resnick, Halliday, and Krane (Volumes I and II) is suggested, focusing on mechanics and electromagnetism, respectively. If a specific textbook will be used at the university, it may be beneficial to begin with that to align with course content. Supplementary texts like "Physics of Everyday Phenomena" offer a simpler introduction, while "The Flying Circus of Physics" is recommended over Halliday and Resnick for a different perspective. Overall, the choice of book should align with the student's comfort with mathematics and their learning preferences.
christian0710
Messages
407
Reaction score
8
Hi,
I want to begin studying physics at university this summer, and I'd like to know. What is a good Physics basics books that will give me a good intuition and solid understanding of subjects such as gravitation, electricity, magnetism etc.? It's been a while since i studied physics in high school so i'd like to get up to speed with a good book.

Christian
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It really depends on how deep you want to dive into the Mathematics.
If you're seeking a textbook that is primarily conceptual with background mathematics, then look into Conceptual Physics 11th Ed. by Paul G. Hewitt.

If you're into the more mathematical aspect of physics, check out the following textbooks:

Physics vol. I by Resnick, Halliday and Krane, 5th Edition
Physics vol. II by Resnick, Halliday, and Krane, 5th edition

Vol I. focusses primarily on Mechanics whereas vol II. focusses primarily on Magnetism, Electrostatics, etc.
 
I'm quite interested in a mix of the conceptual and a book with a good background in algebraic manipulation for physics(I wan't to be ready for calculus by having a solid background)

I think the Physics by Resnick, looks interesting. It might be a big for me, if I was to read such a big book i might as well begin reading the physics textbook "university physics" since it's the book we will be reading at my university, but the again if it's really good it might give me a better understanding :)
 
There's not a lot of difference between the common university intro physics texts (Halliday/Resnick, et al.). The differences are mainly in style and the exact sequence of topics. If you already know which book you'll be using at university, you might as well start with that, assuming you know some calculus already.

Hewitt's book might be useful as a supplement or preliminary reading. You can get an idea of the concepts and general topics without getting bogged down in a lot of mathematical details. However, if you tend to become frustrated by gaps in explanations, or "hand-waving" to skip over mathematical details, then this might not be for you.
 
Cutnell and Johnson for algebra-based.

Knight's book for scientists and engineers for calc-based.

"Physics of Everyday Phenomena" for super-simple conceptual intro (it was my first).

Do not get Halliday and Resnick, just get The Flying Circus of Physics instead.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Back
Top