What's the Best Introductory Book on Quantum Field Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bartosz1982
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Qft
bartosz1982
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hi,

actually i am searching a good introduction into quantum field theory.
the book should be like the lectures of feynman (The Feynman Lectures on Physics), i mean, not so mathematically as usually.

thx for answering
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's quite difficult to find a book which is particularly careless with mathematics. I'd say a useful reading and some neat calculations you can find in Anthony Zee's "Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell".

Daniel.
 
"QED: The strange theory of light and matter", by Feynman is quite a good read, and it uses pretty much no mathematics. At the same time though it doesn't go very deep into the quantum field theory.

It won't give you enough information to do useful calculations though.
 
dextercioby said:
It's quite difficult to find a book which is particularly careless with mathematics. I'd say a useful reading and some neat calculations you can find in Anthony Zee's "Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell".

Daniel.

I actually found that Zee was not a terribly enlightening book unless you already knew quantum field theory (I didn't). I pulled out Itzykson and Zuber, which is an okay book, but it doesn't have exercises, so I'm still a bit flakey. I'm just waiting for the quantum field theory sequence to be offered up next fall so I can get it in a class, which is probably the best place since there really is no Sakurai of quantum field theory.
 
You could try Diagrammatica. I read it about 10 years ago, and it seemed to go really well until about 3/4 of the way through the book where the author seemed to get impatient with trying to explain things, started waving his hands around furiously, and seemed to basically say "nevermind, just do it this way". Still, I think that may be the kind of book you're looking for.

I have a couple of others that are meant for "advanced undergrads", like A Modern Introduction to Quantum Field Theory and
Aitchison and Hey vol. 1, but I haven't had a chance to get very deeply into them. Ryder is also pretty easy to read. And then there's Halzen & Martin, which is more phenomenological.

Oh, and I just ordered a used copy of Feynman's Quantum Electrodynamics. Used paperback copies are cheap. We'll see how that goes.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top