What's the color of Hawking radiation?

Warp
Messages
139
Reaction score
15
What's the "color" of Hawking radiation?

If I understand correctly, the Hawking radiation hypothesis predicts that if a pair of virtual particles appears very close to the event horizon of a black hole, it may happen that one of them falls into the black hole and the other escapes, becoming a real particle (which diminishes the mass of the black hole, perhaps through some kind of quantum tunneling effect).

Having a rough notion of the geometry of space close to the event horizon of a black hole, I'm assuming that for this to happen one of the virtual particles has to go straight "down" and the other straight "up" (or else it would just arc back and also fall into the hole). Straight up is the only possible direction a photon can take to escape the extreme vicinity of the event horizon.

I have been thinking: What is the "color" (ie. the wavelength) of these particles?

If I understand correctly, if an object falls towards a black hole, from an external point of view it will look like the object red-shifts more and more until it becomes completely black (ie. zero frequency) at the event horizon. In other words, light that this object emits gets more and more red-shifted as it approaches the horizon.

Thus, I deduce, Hawking radiation would be very extremely red-shifted, to almost zero frequency (perhaps an infinitesimally small frequency above zero, given that the virtual particles probably appeared infinitesimally close to the event horizon).

If this deduction is correct, it would mean that black holes emit "black light" (ie "light" that has an almost zero frequency).

Is this even close to correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I think you've got it about right except for the quantum tunneling effect, which I don't think has anything to do with Hawking radiation. For reasons I can no longer remember (I THINK it "got" it at one point) the particle that falls in always has negative energy, thus dissipates a tiny bit of mass of the BH, and the other one has positive energy and moves away from the BH, although I don't think it has to be absolutely vertical, just very close. And yes, it has to be severely red shifted as it leaves the BH.
 


It is said that Hawking radiation is thermal, so doesn't have a specific color but follows a Planck spectrum. All the same, it has a temperature, and that means it has an average "color." There is a formula for the temperature of Hawking radiation, but for any black hole that is thought to exist at present, that temperature is incredibly low. So low, in fact, that it should win some kind of award for most widely believed phenomenon that is most difficult to ever have any hope of directly observing!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top