What's the Difference Between Algebras and Sigma-Algebras in Probability?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathNerd
  • Start date Start date
MathNerd
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm currently taking a college level probability course and I am stuck on a couple questions involving algebras and sigma-algebras.

Let S be a fixed set.

1. What is the difference between an algebra on S and a sigma-algebra on S?

2. Why do we require an event space to be a sigma algebra instead of an algebra?

3. Find a set S and an algebra A on S such that A is not a sigma-algebra on S.


Also, I have a proof that I could use some hints on how to start and the general form in which I should go about it.

Prove that every sigma-algebra on S is an algebra on S.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suspect it has something to do with sigma-algebras being limited to only finite intersections.

Continuous random variables cause problems of you assume countable additivity of probability for point events.

--Elucidus
 
MathNerd said:
I'm currently taking a college level probability course and I am stuck on a couple questions involving algebras and sigma-algebras.

Let S be a fixed set.

1. What is the difference between an algebra on S and a sigma-algebra on S?
A sigma algebra is an algebra closed wrt countable unions.
2. Why do we require an event space to be a sigma algebra instead of an algebra?
Because we want probability/measure to be sigma-additive.
3. Find a set S and an algebra A on S such that A is not a sigma-algebra on S.
The system of finite and co-finite subsets of any infinite set forms an algebra which is not a sigma algebra.
Prove that every sigma-algebra on S is an algebra on S.
What definitions of algebra and sigma-algebra are you using? Under most definitions, this would be trivial (perhaps requiring the use of de Morgan's laws).
 
Why do we require an event space to be a sigma algebra instead of an algebra?

Preno said:
Because we want probability/measure to be sigma-additive.

Perhaps not entirely responsive... the next question would be "why do we want that?"

So ... How about:

In order to do probability calculations involving limits of sequences. Either sequences of events or more generally sequences of random variables.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top