What's the difference between QFT and Atomic physics

robertjford80
Messages
388
Reaction score
0
For physics between QM and String Theory I've heard a lot of different names.

Quantum Electrodynamics seems to be the physics of the electron and the photon.

Quantum Chromodynamics seems to be the physics of quarks.

But High Energy/Nuclear/Particle Physics, Atomic physics, QFT, I don't know what the difference between them is. This forum has one category for HE/N/P physics and another for atomic physics so there has to be some difference.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Atomic physics - study of atomic interactions
Nuclear physics - study of nuclear interactions
High energy/particle physics - study of fundamental particle interactions
QFT - the underlying mathematical theory of particle interactions, the particle world version of Newtons laws of motion. You take QFT and put various sorts of particles into it to create QED, QCD etc.
 
Atomic physics is the application of quantum mechanics to the atom, to study, as kurros says, atomic interactions and behavior.

In order to study the interactions of light and matter (QED), we need a relativistic version of quantum mechanics -- this is quantum field theory. So QED and QCD are physical theories based on QFT.

High energy physics is basically synonymous with particle physics, which is the study of the elementary particles and forces of nature. Modern particle physics is based on the Standard Model, which encompasses QED, QCD, and the theory describing the electroweak force.

So, really you have:

Atomic physics <----- Quantum mechanics
Particle physics (high energy physics) <------- QED, QCD, others <------- QFT
Nuclear physics <------- QCD, others <------- QFT, others
 
bapowell said:
So, really you have:

Atomic physics <----- Quantum mechanics
Particle physics (high energy physics) <------- QED, QCD, others <------- QFT
Nuclear physics <------- QCD, others <------- QFT, others

To be more precise, QFT is required to do precision atomic physics (the most obvious and historically first example is the Lamb shift calculation). Quantum mechanics as taught in undergraduate physics classes is not sufficient to do precision atomic physics (for example second order perturbation theory of most interactions gives infinite results).
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top