What's the error in my derivations? (impulse/momentum)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kyuutoryuu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivations Error
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between force and momentum, specifically how the integral of force over time relates to momentum. It highlights that the change in momentum is represented by the area under the force versus time curve. A key point raised is the oversight of the integration constant in the derivation, which is crucial for accurately expressing momentum. The correct formulation states that the final momentum equals the initial momentum plus the change in momentum. This clarification is essential for resolving the confusion in the derivation of momentum from force.
Kyuutoryuu
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
1e3552f0ba72ecafdafc6b9f80b92d84.png


(Change in momentum is the area under a force against time curve.)

7e4c6b89a53d0f0618da45b0241d6c4d.png


(Force is the time derivative of momentum.)

Using separation of varibles, you get Fdt=dp. Integrate both sides, you get that the integral of Force with respect to time is equal to p. This seems to imply that p, momentum, is equal to change in momentum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kyuutoryuu said:
Using separation of varibles, you get Fdt=dp. Integrate both sides, you get that the integral of Force with respect to time is equal to p. This seems to imply that p, momentum, is equal to change in momentum?
Look at your first equation. It defines the integral of F (in your sense) as a change in momentum.
 
Kyuutoryuu said:
1e3552f0ba72ecafdafc6b9f80b92d84.png


(Change in momentum is the area under a force against time curve.)

7e4c6b89a53d0f0618da45b0241d6c4d.png


(Force is the time derivative of momentum.)

Using separation of varibles, you get Fdt=dp. Integrate both sides, you get that the integral of Force with respect to time is equal to p. This seems to imply that p, momentum, is equal to change in momentum?

You forgot the integration constant. Momentum after = momentum before + change in momentum.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top