What's the most high-energy photon or particle discovered? Where are we in that?

  • Thread starter Thread starter questionpost
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle Photon
questionpost
Messages
194
Reaction score
0
I googled it and got some particles with 5×10^19eV- 3.69×10^25eV-, but I know I've heard bigger somewhere else...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
questionpost said:
I googled it and got some particles with 5×10^19eV- 3.69×10^25eV-, but I know I've heard bigger somewhere else...
From where did one find those numbers. The number 5×10^19eV is frequently given in reference to the 'GZK cutoff' or 'GZK limit'.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greisen–Zatsepin–Kuzmin_limit

There are some indications of particle energies in the 1020 eV range.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra-high-energy_cosmic_ray

One should review the following (and search for reliable information on Ultrahigh energy cosmis rays, or UHECR):
http://www.telescopearray.org/outreach/uhecr.html

http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.1872

http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C040802/papers/L020.PDF

http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~rene/talks/Cronin-Fest-Ong-Writeup.pdf

http://uhecr.uchicago.edu/depot/uhecr-wp.pdf

http://canopus.chungnam.ac.kr/kaw3/00_PDF_kaw3/v37n5p421_jones.pdf


In terrestrial proton accelerators (synchrotrons), we get particles into the TeV (1012 eV) range, but not quite to 1013 eV.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was thinking more around *10^27 and beyond...
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top