RingoKid said:
yes i do actually but there might be the odd exception.
Hmm, the "real" world. Would that be as opposed to the "fake" world? Last I checked, I get up and go to work, pay my mortgage and car payments, do the grocery shopping, mow the lawn, and just happen to be fortunate that my career is something I enjoy very much, so much so that I continue to talk about the subject with young people aspiring to the same goals in my free time. When you have experienced the "real world" for yourself, please report back.
likewise. Give me an original thought you may have had. and not one regurgitated from somebody else. Dazzle me with your brilliance. Otherwise perhaps comment on my first post in the "coming unified theory" thread that got locked too soon or even my second post.
I prefer to remain anonymous on internet sites as I've run into some wackos before, otherwise I would cite some of my own peer-reviewed publications here to demonstrate
my original thoughts. But that has nothing to do with the comment to which you were responding, which was about teaching, not necessarily original ideas, but new to you.
I mean really is this where I'm supposed to be intellectually intimidated and fearful of getting banned because we have a differing of opinions ?
This isn't about differing opinions. Plenty of people here have differing opinions. As long as you follow the rules of the board to which you agreed when you signed up, you have nothing to fear. If you don't follow the rules, then it is reasonable for the admins to ban you. Hint: posting crackpot theories in inappropriate topics and then complaining when the mentors do their job of locking the thread is not exactly following the forum rules.
sorry to disappoint you but if you think locked away in your ivory towers publishing papers that have little or no relevence to the "real" world and "real" people gives you a monopoly on defining truth and the nature of knowledge then I'm afraid you might just be deluding yourself.
Here we go again, "real" world and "real" people. If you took some time to learn about and understand real scientific publications, you might see the relevance to the real world. And, last I checked, nobody gets to "define" truth, unless perhaps you're a politician. Truth is just truth.
Bariyon's thread could have opened up new insights and discussion on metaphysics and what was that word again ?... epistemology. It may have possibly even triggered an original thought on your behalf but alas we'll never know now.
So, you're continuing to insist the thread shouldn't be locked, yet refuse to even do so much as type "epistemology" into Google to find out what the topic of that forum is really about? Here, I'll make it easier for you:
http://pantheon.yale.edu/~kd47/What-Is-Epistemology.htm
Epistemology, then, is the branch of philosophy that deals with questions concerning the nature, scope, and sources of knowledge.
*
don't you mean rigor mortis ?
Intentionally misunderstanding the meaning is not going to help your argument. If you don't know what rigor means, look it up.
as far as I understand these aren't the hallowed halls of science in some crusty university this is merely a cyber drop in cafe of physics minded people of all ages and intellects. If you want academic philosophical arguments then post up a thread and let's have it.
For many people here, this is indeed an extension of a university setting. There are many people here who have advanced degrees or who are in the process of obtaining them and come here to have intelligent, academic discussions. Greg and Chroot are the site admins. They have decided to create a site that upholds higher academic standards that the typical crackpot-filled sites infesting the internet, and they are enforcing those rules. If you don't agree with that, then, as many others have told you, you are more than welcome to post your thoughts elsewhere. Should we have overlooked something brilliant in your posts, then you can have the last laugh when some other site gets the credit for recognizing your brilliance first. We'll just have to live with that.
now why the hell would i want to be a serious academic for if it means losing touch with reality or limiting ones knowledge ?
You really don't understand what academics or academic arguments are all about. Academics is not about limiting knowledge. Quite the opposite, it is about expanding knowledge. Indeed, what you seem to be missing the point about all along is that epistemology is all about knowledge. It is not about losing touch with reality, but about understanding the very real world around us all the better. An academic philosophical argument means it needs to be
logical and follows from
well-defined terms and premises.