What's the symbol for standard enthelpy change?

AI Thread Summary
The symbol for standard enthalpy change is ΔH°. To calculate the standard enthalpy change for a reaction, subtract the total enthalpy of the reactants from the total enthalpy of the products. For the reaction 2SO₂(g) + O₂(g) → 2SO₃(g), the enthalpy of formation for oxygen is zero since it is in its elemental form. Only the standard enthalpies of SO₂ and SO₃ are needed, taking their coefficients into account. Understanding these principles is essential for accurate calculations of enthalpy changes in chemical reactions.
bubbles
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
I have a couple of things I need help on:

1. How do I calculate the standard enthalpy change for a reaction?

example: 2SO_2 (g) + O_2(g) \rightarrow 2 SO_3(g)

What information do I need to calculate standard enthalpy change? What's the symbol for standard enthalpy change?

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The symbol is \Delta H^{\circ}. The enthalpy of formation is the enthalpy of the products minus the enthalpy of the reactants. Since the oxygen is in its elemental form its enthalpy is 0, all you need to know are H^{\circ} for SO_2 and SO_3. Don't forget to consider their coefficients.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top