Wheatstone bridge in Linear Algebra

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying Kirchhoff's laws to analyze a Wheatstone bridge circuit in the context of linear algebra. The key relationship established is that the ratio of resistances r1/r4 equals r2/r3, which is crucial for understanding the circuit's behavior. Participants emphasize the importance of labeling circuit nodes and applying Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) to derive equations based on node voltages. By setting one voltage to zero and assuming current directions, users can simplify the problem and solve for unknowns effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's laws, specifically Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL).
  • Familiarity with circuit analysis concepts, including node voltage analysis.
  • Basic knowledge of Wheatstone bridge configurations and their properties.
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations to solve for unknown variables.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) in circuit analysis.
  • Learn about node voltage analysis techniques in electrical engineering.
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of the Wheatstone bridge balance condition.
  • Investigate the implications of zero current through specific resistors in circuit theory.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrical engineering, physics enthusiasts, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of circuit analysis and the Wheatstone bridge concept.

Gunner1412
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I remember in physics class that we saw this set up.The ratio of r1/r4=r2/r3 is the same. There is no use for the current to head through R5 if it's the same energy on both sides. Now in linear I have no idea how to use this.


Homework Equations



?

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried re-arranging Kirchhoff's laws, but it didn't give me enough variables to solve...

Please help guys, I really can't figure this one out.
 

Attachments

  • wheat.JPG
    wheat.JPG
    13.5 KB · Views: 589
Physics news on Phys.org
We'll need to fix our notation in order to understand each other. Start by labeling nodes in the circuit as follows.

Node a connects [itex]R_1[/itex] and [itex]R_2[/itex].
Node b connects [itex]R_1[/itex], [itex]R_5[/itex], and [itex]R_4[/itex]
Node c connects [itex]R_2[/itex], [itex]R_5[/itex], and [itex]R_3[/itex].
Node d connects [itex]R_3[/itex] and [itex]R_4[/itex].

Let the voltages at these nodes be [itex]v_a[/itex], [itex]v_b[/itex], [itex]v_c[/itex], and [itex]v_d[/itex]. Since only potential differences are physically meaningful you can set any one of these equal to zero. Just so our notations match, let [itex]v_d[/itex]=0.

Now you have to assume a direction for the currents through the resistors. Let the currents flow from top to bottom. Recalling that currents flow from higher potentials to lower ones, you should be able to write down expressions for the currents through the resistors in terms of the node voltages and resistances. Then you need to do the following.

1.) Apply KCL. There are only 2 nodes at which you can apply KCL, because you don't know the current flowing through the battery. So it should be easy to see where to do it. This will give you 2 equations, which is all you need.
2.) If the current [itex]i_5[/itex] through resistor [itex]R_5[/itex] is zero, then which two node voltages must be equal? This will eliminate one of the unknowns.

At this point you should be able to derive the result.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K