When a meteoroid enters the atmosphere

  • Thread starter Thread starter yasar1967
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atmosphere
AI Thread Summary
When a meteoroid enters the atmosphere, it transforms into a meteor, primarily heating due to air compression rather than friction. Scientists use numerical analysis, potentially involving the Navier-Stokes equations, to study the complex interactions between the meteoroid and the atmosphere, including turbulence and pressure differences. The heat generated can be substantial, often leading to the meteor burning up before reaching the ground. The likelihood of a meteoroid surviving to impact is influenced by its chemical composition, with "dirty snowballs" typically disintegrating in the atmosphere, while metallic meteoroids must reach a certain size to survive. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for modeling meteoroid behavior and potential ground events.
yasar1967
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
When a meteoroid enters the atmosphere and becomes a meteor, it burns due to great fraction between the rock and and the air. But how scientists calculate the exact amount of kinetic energy converted to heat due to fricton and how much of this is used to heat up the rock and how much of it is used to heat up the air surronds it? Can they quantitatively analyze each part of its journey until it hits the ground?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yasar1967 said:
When a meteoroid enters the atmosphere and becomes a meteor, it burns due to great fraction between the rock and and the air. But how scientists calculate the exact amount of kinetic energy converted to heat due to friction and how much of this is used to heat up the rock and how much of it is used to heat up the air that surrounds it? Can they quantitatively analyze each part of its journey until it hits the ground?

I'm not entirely sure about this, but I suspect that the problem is analysed numerically (using a computer/supercomputer), using the Navier-Stokes equations. The problem is really very complex, and involves both frictional effects (stokes drag) and the creation of a turbulent wake behind the meteoroid, which leads to a stark pressure difference which slows the meteoroid down. This is just a guess though, I'm not in the business of atmospheric meteoroid modelling. It's also possible that they analyse historical meteoroid data to watch for trends and thus build up empirical models.
 
Most of the heat is due to a very high amount of compression of the air, not friction. The amount of heat generated is very large, and the temperature of the object's surfaces becomes very high before it the heat output through radiation and convection via the air balance out the heat input, usually high enough to burn up the meteor.
 
Be aware that the chance of a meteorite penetrating Earth's atmosphere to a "ground event" has a great deal to do with it's chemical composition.
 
pallidin said:
Be aware that the chance of a meteorite penetrating Earth's atmosphere to a "ground event" has a great deal to do with it's chemical composition.

You are correct. The two general classifications are "dirty snowballs" and "metallic".
Dirty snowballs usually explode high in the atmosphere, often referred to as a bolide event.
Metallic objects have to be a certain size to penetrate the atmosphere and hit the ground.
Near Odessa, TX, several years ago, an object hit the ground near a little league ball game. The boys who picked it up told the reporter that it was very hot when they picked it up but that within a few minutes is was very cold. This makes sense when you realize how cold space is and how little time friction had to heat up the object.
 
Last edited:
rcgldr said:
Most of the heat is due to a very high amount of compression of the air, not friction. The amount of heat generated is very large, and the temperature of the object's surfaces becomes very high before it the heat output through radiation and convection via the air balance out the heat input, usually high enough to burn up the meteor.

Rapid compression of air can generate such levels of heat that Indonesions have used two bamboo tubes forming a piston chamber combination with a little tinder in the chamber to ignite fires. When the piston is forced down into the chamber the tinder ignites.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top