When can Gauss' theorem be applied?

AI Thread Summary
Gauss's theorem can be applied in scenarios with high symmetry, such as concentric spheres, concentric cylinders, and parallel planes, allowing for easier evaluation of integrals. While commonly used examples include coaxial cables and point charges, the discussion raises the question of applying the theorem to less typical configurations, like parallel planes at the same height. The electric field remains constant in magnitude and direction on symmetrical surfaces, simplifying calculations. Although Gauss's law is universally applicable, its practical utility is limited to cases with significant symmetry. The theorem is not effective in rotating frames, highlighting its constraints in certain conditions.
CraigH
Messages
221
Reaction score
1
I'm currently reading an electromagnetism textbook and it has said that Gauss's theorem can only be applied on:

Concentric spheres
Concentric cylinders
Parallel planes

In these cases the "symmetry allows the integrals to be evaluated"

In class we only ever really use co-axle cables, micro-strip lines, parallel plates, and point charges as examples, as these all can be described by one of these 3 shapes. My question is asking about the more obscure shapes that could still technically be called one of these 3 shapes.

For example when talking about micro-strip or parallel plates the planes are always above and below each other, as shown in the picture bellow.
mstrip.gif

250px-Parallel_plate_capacitor.svg.png


But can the two planes be next to each other? They would still be parallel, they are just now at the same height. For example a micro-strip with the feed and ground line both on the same side of the PCB.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It can be used everywhere where the requirements are satisfied, otherwise it would not be a theorem. This does not mean that it has to be useful everywhere, however.
A capacitor with parallel plates is probably easier to evaluate without Gauß, but this would give the same result.
 
Hey

I studying em as well. The way I understand it is that the reason these symmetrical surfaces are used is because the electric field is constant in magnitude and direction everywhere on the surface. This makes the integral trivial.

Gauss' law does apply everywhere, but it is only useful in this way in when there is high symmetry.
 
i read somewhere that Gauss's theorem can be applied anywhere except in rotating frames
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top