When can I decompose a random variable $Y=X'-X''$?

aspiring88
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am wondering if I can find a decomposition of Y that is absolutely continuous nto two i.i.d. random variables X' and X'' such that Y=X'-X'', where X' is also Lebesgue measure with an almost everywhere positive density w.r.t to the Lebesge mesure.

My main intent is to come up with two i.i.d. random variable, X' and X'' and Y and Y'', such that Pr(m> Y'-Y'')=Pr(m>X'-X'') for m \in (-b,b) for some b small enough, while Pr(m+2> Y'-Y'')=Pr(m+1> X'-X''). I figured starting first by constructing a measure on the difference first that satisfies the above then decomposing it. Is this possible?

Thanks so much in advance for your much appreciated help.

Mod note: fixed LaTeX
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
fix the latex.
 
Firstly your Y must be symmetric. If it has a characteristic function g(t) you could check whether g(t) = h(t)h(-t) for some other c.f. h(t).
 
Hey aspiring88 and welcome to the forums.

Since you are using the i.i.d property for your random variables, what you can do is use the convolution property, but you have to map your probabilities to the 'inverse' values instead of the positive values: in other words if your domain for the B RV in X = A + B is [0,infinity), then you have to change the mapping from (-infinity,0] and this can be done by just flipping the sign.

Using the convolution theorem, you can substitute your identities in and you will have a relationship that has to hold.

Because the convolution should return the CDF directly, this means that you should basically get a relationship between two integral expressions and from there you can get more specific with the properties of your density functions as you wish.
 
Thanks so much @chiro and @bpet. I'm still a bit loss. So you're recommendation is to start with one arbitrary characteristic function that is hopefully decomposable and see if I can craft another one?

Thanks again.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top