When can I use the prompt jump approximation?

AI Thread Summary
The prompt jump approximation is useful for understanding reactor behavior during transients, particularly when the mean generation time is very small and the reactivity change is significantly less than one. It is valid when the precursor concentration remains constant and the reactivity is much smaller than the delayed neutron fraction (ρ << β). This approximation allows for observing prompt jumps in small reactors or during rapid reactivity changes, such as rod movements or scrams. However, it should not be applied when the reactor is close to prompt criticality. Overall, while it aids in interpreting reactor dynamics, it is not typically used in formal calculations.
dRic2
Gold Member
Messages
887
Reaction score
225
I know that it is only an approximation to get an idea, but at times it works quite well (in class we solved the kinetics equation for a PWR reactor (point-reactor model) with MATLAB and then we plotted the solution along with the prompt jump approximation... It was very good).
But I did not fully understand when you can use it. It seems to me that the main conditions are:
1) very small mean generation time
2) I have a step of reactivity very far from 1$ (much smaller or bigger).

Any other constraints ? (Point-reactor model for kinetics equation must hold in the first place)

Thanks Ric
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
When you derive the prompt jump, the first approximation is that the precursor concentration does not change and you are calculating the change due to prompt neutrons. This is a valid approximation for times immediately after a transient because the prompt neutrons have a much shorter lifetime than the precursors.

The second approximation is that ##\rho \ll \beta## so that the following exponential is negligible.
$$ \exp \left( \frac{\rho-\beta}{\Lambda} t \right) \approx 0$$

Therefore, the equation is valid any time $$\rho \ll \beta$$. The reactivity can be positive or negative, but definitely cannot be greater than beta (i.e. must not be prompt critical or close to prompt critical.)

As an example, if you have a reactivity change of $0.1 and a lifetime of 10-4, the exponential is exp(-58t), which is extremely small.

Your next question is "when can this be used?". The prompt jump approximation is mainly used to help you understand how the reactor operates, and also to interpret the behavior of a reactor. You can see the prompt jump occur when you pull rods in a small reactor, or scram in any reactor (usually large reactors change reactivity too slow to observe the prompt jump). As far as I know, it is not "used" in any calculations, it just helps explain the reactor behavior.

I hope this helps.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes anorlunda, dRic2 and Astronuc
Thank you very much! Very clear and helpful explanation!
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top