When do I use this k5 Kinematic Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter EASports555
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematic
AI Thread Summary
The kinematic equation d = Vƒt - 0.5at^2 allows for the calculation of one unknown variable when the other three are known. The discussion highlights that the equation includes four variables: displacement (d), final velocity (Vƒ), acceleration (a), and time (t), while the initial velocity (Vi) is not part of the equation. To find the initial velocity, additional equations may be necessary. Rearranging the equation can help solve for any unknown variable if three are provided. Understanding how to manipulate the equation is crucial for solving kinematic problems effectively.
EASports555
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Vƒ = velocity final
Vi = velocity initial
a=acceleration
t=time
0.5 = ½
^2 = squared
- = minus
d = displacement
Equation
d = t - 0.5at^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I look at your equation, and it has 4 variables; d, vf, a, and t.
I look at the list you have in parentheses and there are 5 variables (vi, a, vf, t, and d)
Clearly one of the variables in parentheses is not in the equation. Which one is it? That will tell you the variable that you do not have.

That seems to be the answer, but I do not see how that is going to be useful to you. Is this part of a more elaborate, or better stated problem? Are you trying to find the initial velocity? If you are, it looks like you will need some other equation.
 
EASports555 said:
Summary:: What Variable do I not have when I use this equation? ( Vi = velocity initial , a = acceleration, vf = velocity final, t = time, d= displacement)

Vƒ = velocity final
Vi = velocity initial
a=acceleration
t=time
0.5 = ½
^2 = squared
- = minus
d = displacement
Equation
d = t - 0.5at^2
With any equation you can find a single unknown quantity if you know all the others. The equation: $$d = v_ft - \frac 1 2 at^2$$ has four quantities. If you know any three, then you can calculate the fourth. This may require you to rearrange the equation. For example, if you know ##d, v_f## and ##t##, then you can find the acceleration by rearranging the equation to: $$a = \frac{2(v_ft - d)}{t^2}$$ And you can calculate ##a## by plugging in the known quantities: ##d, v_f## and ##t##.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top