When do I use this k5 Kinematic Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter EASports555
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematic
AI Thread Summary
The kinematic equation d = Vƒt - 0.5at^2 allows for the calculation of one unknown variable when the other three are known. The discussion highlights that the equation includes four variables: displacement (d), final velocity (Vƒ), acceleration (a), and time (t), while the initial velocity (Vi) is not part of the equation. To find the initial velocity, additional equations may be necessary. Rearranging the equation can help solve for any unknown variable if three are provided. Understanding how to manipulate the equation is crucial for solving kinematic problems effectively.
EASports555
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Vƒ = velocity final
Vi = velocity initial
a=acceleration
t=time
0.5 = ½
^2 = squared
- = minus
d = displacement
Equation
d = t - 0.5at^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I look at your equation, and it has 4 variables; d, vf, a, and t.
I look at the list you have in parentheses and there are 5 variables (vi, a, vf, t, and d)
Clearly one of the variables in parentheses is not in the equation. Which one is it? That will tell you the variable that you do not have.

That seems to be the answer, but I do not see how that is going to be useful to you. Is this part of a more elaborate, or better stated problem? Are you trying to find the initial velocity? If you are, it looks like you will need some other equation.
 
EASports555 said:
Summary:: What Variable do I not have when I use this equation? ( Vi = velocity initial , a = acceleration, vf = velocity final, t = time, d= displacement)

Vƒ = velocity final
Vi = velocity initial
a=acceleration
t=time
0.5 = ½
^2 = squared
- = minus
d = displacement
Equation
d = t - 0.5at^2
With any equation you can find a single unknown quantity if you know all the others. The equation: $$d = v_ft - \frac 1 2 at^2$$ has four quantities. If you know any three, then you can calculate the fourth. This may require you to rearrange the equation. For example, if you know ##d, v_f## and ##t##, then you can find the acceleration by rearranging the equation to: $$a = \frac{2(v_ft - d)}{t^2}$$ And you can calculate ##a## by plugging in the known quantities: ##d, v_f## and ##t##.
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top