When do SO(2) actions on the circle in the plane determine a metric?

lavinia
Science Advisor
Messages
3,362
Reaction score
749
a metric on the plane determines an action of SO(2) on is unit circle by rotation.

Suppose one starts with a free transitive action of SO(2) on a circle. When does this come from a metric? Always?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is a rough idea without calculations. I have not proved anything, so I might be misunderstanding something somewhere, or I might have just made a mistake in my thinking. Also, since you did not state the nature of the metric, I assumed the easiest thing which is that the metric is an inner product metric. Please clarify if you meant something more general.

Lets first consider a free transitive action of SO(2) on the circle. Both can be denoted R/2piZ.

Then we can parametrize these actions by strictly increasing functions F(s) satisfying F(0)=0, F(2pi)=2pi and whose derivative F' is periodic. Then the action of s on t is given by

s*t = F(s+F^{-1}(t))

Now let us consider the action induced by a metric. This is vague because I dont' know what you mean exactly by metric. So I will assume you mean an inner product metric. This is given by a quadratic form: Ax^2+2Bxy+Cy^2. I think it is clear that the resulting action of SO(2) is unchanged by scaling the coefficients of this inner product, so such actions are determined by 2 numbers. In more geometric terms, these two numbers are:
1. The angular inclination of the eigenvector that lies in the first quadrant,
2. The ratio of the eigenvalues.

If your metric is Finsler, then I don't understand it well enough to describe the resulting action of SO(2) on the circle. But I would be interested to know more about that.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top