When does backgroud radiation more signifigant?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rlrennin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation
AI Thread Summary
Background radiation is generally constant regardless of distance from a radiation source, but its significance can increase when measurements are taken over longer periods, making it comparable to the source's radiation levels. Factors such as location, altitude, and geological composition affect the amount of background radiation, with higher levels typically found at greater altitudes and in areas rich in radioactive materials. The inverse square law indicates that radiation intensity decreases exponentially with distance, meaning background radiation becomes less significant as one moves away from the source. Additionally, the type of radiation influences how it interacts with materials; alpha particles are easily blocked, while gamma rays can penetrate denser materials. Overall, distance, type of radiation, and environmental factors must all be considered in experiments involving background radiation.
rlrennin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
We did an experiment. We used a geiger counter to measure wafers of alpha, beta, and gamma radiation. We measured by distance away and by using thinks to block the radiation like aluminum, paper, lead. Distances were 1cm, 10 cm, 20cm, 40cm. Would the distance be the answer because there would be more background radiation the further away you get? please help me
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no more background radiation the further you move the counter from the source. It is generally constant. However to get good readings from your source at a greater distance, you were probably reading the counts over a longer time. Therefore the background radiation becomes significant as their rate become comparitable with the rate you're measuring.
 


The amount of background radiation present varies depending on several factors such as location, altitude, and geological composition. However, generally speaking, background radiation is more significant at higher altitudes and in areas with higher levels of radioactive elements in the soil. This is because cosmic rays from outer space and naturally occurring radioactive materials such as radon gas contribute to background radiation.

In your experiment, the distance from the source of radiation does play a role in the amount of background radiation measured. As you move further away from the source, the amount of radiation decreases due to the inverse square law. This means that the intensity of radiation decreases exponentially as the distance from the source increases. Therefore, the further away you are from a source of radiation, the less significant the background radiation will be.

However, other factors such as the type of radiation and the materials used to block the radiation can also affect the results. For example, alpha particles have a short range and can be easily blocked by materials such as paper, while gamma rays have a longer range and can penetrate through thicker materials such as lead. Therefore, the type of radiation being measured and the materials used to block it can also impact the significance of background radiation.

In conclusion, while distance does play a role in the amount of background radiation measured, it is not the only factor to consider. Other factors such as altitude, location, and the type of radiation being measured also play a significant role. It is important to take all of these factors into account when conducting experiments and interpreting results related to background radiation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top