Penetrating power of radiation questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter tg22542
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Radiation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around questions related to the penetrating power of beta and gamma radiation as measured by a Geiger-Mueller tube. The original poster presents a scenario involving a worksheet with data on radiation counts through various shielding materials, seeking clarification on the purpose of measurements and the effects of distance on radiation detection.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the significance of measuring radiation activity without shielding and the importance of maintaining a constant distance from the radiation source. They also question how the results would differ if gamma radiation were used instead of beta radiation.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaging in a dialogue that explores the nature of radiation and its behavior over distance. Some are questioning the underlying principles of wave strength and visibility, while others are considering the implications of absorption in different environments. There is a mix of interpretations being explored without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that the data table may not be relevant to their questions but is open to including it if necessary. There is an indication of uncertainty regarding the effects of distance on radiation counts and the comparative penetration of different types of radiation.

tg22542
Messages
79
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



My questions relate to a worksheet given which includes a data table displaying results from putting a source of beta radiation near a Geiger-Mueller tube, and recording the Beta radioactivity through the shielding. It started off with the radiation going through nothing, where it was 1000 counts/min, then it shows data measured through cardboard, aluminum and lead. Then 2 sheets, then 3 etc. But the data should not be relevant to these questions really. If you think I should include the data table, let me know and I will do so.

1) What was the purpose of measuring the activity with no shielding material in place?

2) Why was it important to keep the distance between the source and the Geiger-Mueller tube constant

3) If you repeat the exercise using gamma radiation (with unshielded reading of 1000count/min)| instead of beta radiation, which numbers in the table would change? Would they be higher or lower?


Homework Equations



none


The Attempt at a Solution



1) We would do this in order to find the beta radioactivity amount that is given off by our source with no obstructions

2) We need to keep the distance constant because if we changed the distance our data would be different. If we moved it farther away we could have less count/min <--- but i don't know why, or if this is true. not sure what else to say

3) Gamma radiation would penetrate through the material much easier than beta. Gamma radiation is electromagnetic radiation of high energy, thus is stronger. <-- Need more on this answer as well.

Any help will be greatly appreciated,
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
2) A light bulb appears brighter when it is closer. A loudspeaker sounds louder when one is nearby. Why is that so?
 
Because you're closer to the strongest waves?
 
Let's assume that for a second. Where and why do the strongest waves disappear? And why are they at the source to begin with?
 
They become weaker and less visible as they travel further. They are at the source because it is creating energy and the waves are the visible energy
 
But why do they become weaker?
 
Because the photons are being absorbed by different atoms thus weakening the visible energy?
 
Imagine this is happening in vacuum. No absorption.

Actually, you don't even have to imagine this.

Look at the stars. Look at the Sun. They are all in a very good vacuum. Yet the Sun seems so much brighter than any star, even if many of those stars emit a lot more light than does the Sun.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K