When Does Radium-226 Become Safe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Moonflower
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Radium-226 (226Ra) is considered "safe" when its radiation levels fall below established safety limits, which vary by country. The half-life of 226Ra is approximately 1600 years, meaning it decays slowly, and its safety depends on the total amount present and its concentration. In mining, a safe exposure limit is about 3.5 mJhours/m^3 or 250 Bq/m^3, assuming 160 hours of exposure per month. For household environments, where exposure can exceed 12 hours daily, stricter limits apply to ensure safety. Ultimately, safety is determined by the remaining concentration of 226Ra in grams, often expressed in micrograms per gram.
Moonflower
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
When does 226Ra become "safe"?

Hi, I was working on an assignment which deals with radioactive decay.
Half life of 226Ra is 1600 years (it varies from source to source, but this is the one I chose), and the equation I got for half-life is y=Ce^(-0.000433216988t), C being the initial value and y being amount left in grams, and t being the amount of time passed in years.

When does 226Ra become "safe", where the radiation from it is no longer considered to the public? I know 226Ra is a toxic element, so I'm expecting pretty low...
also, if possible, give the units in grams, like x micrograms per gram, not using other units like pCi/L.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Safe depends on the amount of radiation.
When there is either a small enough total amount of the material, or it has decayed to a point where there is a small enough amount of the radioactive isotope left to meet the safety limits for your country.
Generally with Radon the halflife isn't really a factor because new Radon is being produced from the Uranium in the native rock so there is a constant amount of radioactive Radon present.

In mining there is a monthly safe limit - this assumes 160hours exposure (40hours/week * 4weeks) and is equal to roughly 3.5 mJhours/m^3 or a concentration of 250Bq/m^3

Household exposure where you are exposed to the gas for >12hours a day and there is no monitoring would be higher, and so the safe limit in a home must be lower.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top