When n*(n+1)/2 - k is never a square

  • Thread starter Thread starter OlderOwl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Square
OlderOwl
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I found that the series represented by An = n∗(n+1)/2 - k never includes a perfect square if and only if the prime factorization of 8∗k+1 includes a prime factor, p, to the ith power where p = +/−3 mod 8 and i is odd and that this can be proved mod p(i + 1)
For instance, 8* 4 + 1 = 3^1 * 11^1 so we can prove mod 9 that n*(n+1)/2 - 4 is never a square. The square residues mod 9 are {0,1,4,7} but for n = 0 to 8 the residues of n*(n+1)/2 - 4 mod 9 are {5,6,8,2,6,2,8,6,5} which are not any of the square residues. Thus n*(n+1)/2 - 4 can never be a square for integer n.
I also found that if 8∗k+1 includes a prime factor, p, to the ith power where p = +/−3 mod 8 and i is odd that k * (2*m+1)2+m(m+1)/2 is a k' such that 8k' +1 also contains p to an odd power in the prime factorization. I was wondering if there is any higher algebra that could prove my findings.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you worked out the backward problem?
i.e. given ##8k+1 = p^i m = (\pm 3)^i (8q )^i## then ## A_n = \frac{n(n+1)}{2} - k ## never contains a square using ##\mod p^{i+1}##?
 
I don't see how you get pim ≡ (±3)im ≡ (±3)i(8q)i since p and m both ≡ (±3) mod 8
 
Last edited:
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top