When r=0 in Coulomb's law; electron self-repulsion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the paradox of electron self-repulsion in Coulomb's law, particularly when considering r=0, which suggests infinite force due to the inverse square relationship. Participants agree that the electron cannot be treated as a classical point particle, as this leads to contradictions. Instead, the concept of quantum foam is introduced as a potential resolution, indicating that the electron's behavior transcends classical definitions. It is noted that even when treated as a point particle, there is no self-force acting on the electron due to its own potential. The total potential energy, while infinite, does not influence the force experienced by the electron based on its position.
nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,748
Reaction score
243
Given that
(a) the electrostatic force is inversely proportional to r2
(b) that the electron is (when it is determined) a point
(c) that the repulsion for an electron to itself is therefore r=0
(d) that r=0 would naively end up with infinite force
What is the way out of this problem?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electron must not be a classical point particle.
 
  • Like
Likes nomadreid
DaleSpam said:
The electron must not be a classical point particle.
OK, that "classical" in the answer is perhaps the key. But it is, according to Fermilab, http://www.fnal.gov/pub/today/archive/archive_2013/today13-02-15_NutshellReadMore.html, a point particle, even if not classical. That site hints that the solution lies in the quantum foam, but it isn't very explicit in its explanation.
 
Even when viewing the electron as a classical point particle, there is no force acting on it from its own potential. The total potential energy (although technically infinite) does not depend on where the electron is located and the force is given by how the total potential depends on the position.
 
  • Like
Likes nomadreid
Orodruin: Ah, looking at it from the point of view of potential energy... that makes sense, thanks.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top