When r=0 in Coulomb's law; electron self-repulsion

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the paradox of electron self-repulsion in Coulomb's law, particularly when considering r=0, which suggests infinite force due to the inverse square relationship. Participants agree that the electron cannot be treated as a classical point particle, as this leads to contradictions. Instead, the concept of quantum foam is introduced as a potential resolution, indicating that the electron's behavior transcends classical definitions. It is noted that even when treated as a point particle, there is no self-force acting on the electron due to its own potential. The total potential energy, while infinite, does not influence the force experienced by the electron based on its position.
nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,762
Reaction score
248
Given that
(a) the electrostatic force is inversely proportional to r2
(b) that the electron is (when it is determined) a point
(c) that the repulsion for an electron to itself is therefore r=0
(d) that r=0 would naively end up with infinite force
What is the way out of this problem?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electron must not be a classical point particle.
 
  • Like
Likes nomadreid
DaleSpam said:
The electron must not be a classical point particle.
OK, that "classical" in the answer is perhaps the key. But it is, according to Fermilab, http://www.fnal.gov/pub/today/archive/archive_2013/today13-02-15_NutshellReadMore.html, a point particle, even if not classical. That site hints that the solution lies in the quantum foam, but it isn't very explicit in its explanation.
 
Even when viewing the electron as a classical point particle, there is no force acting on it from its own potential. The total potential energy (although technically infinite) does not depend on where the electron is located and the force is given by how the total potential depends on the position.
 
  • Like
Likes nomadreid
Orodruin: Ah, looking at it from the point of view of potential energy... that makes sense, thanks.
 
I'm working through something and want to make sure I understand the physics. In a system with three wave components at 120° phase separation, the total energy calculation depends on how we treat them: If coherent (add amplitudes first, then square): E = (A₁ + A₂ + A₃)² = 0 If independent (square each, then add): E = A₁² + A₂² + A₃² = 3/2 = constant In three-phase electrical systems, we treat the phases as independent — total power is sum of individual powers. In light interference...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
19K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K