When to Implicit , When Not To?

  • Thread starter Thread starter magorium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Implicit
magorium
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




We have a surface z^2 = 4x^2 + 2yx + 5y^2 , find the shortest distance to Origin.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



My trouble is , i think z^2 - 4x^2 + 2yx + 4y^2 = 0 as a constraint to function L = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 (Square of distance formula. If distance is minimum , square of it should be too).

Now i will use grad(L) = Lambda*grad(surface)

But while finding the gradient of surface , i need derivatives respect to x , y and z as vector components. Now , while taking the derivative of constraint respect to x , should i use the implicit differentiaton ? My book just directly takes the differential of it respect to x , doesn't use the implicit diff.

When dealing with plane equations , multivariable calculus , when to use implicit diff and when not to ? How could i understand if z is a function of x and y or they all are three variables ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When you take partial derivatives with respect to x, y, or z, you are, by definition, treating the other variables as constant. That is why you do not differentiate y and z, for example, with respect to x when taking the partial derivative with respect to x.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top