When to use equal to or equivalent to?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Darth Frodo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalent
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the appropriate use of the symbols "=" and "≡" in mathematical contexts. The "=" symbol is used for equations that are conditionally true, such as 2x + 1 = 5, which holds only under specific conditions. In contrast, "≡" is reserved for identities that are universally true, like (x + 1)² ≡ x² + 2x + 1, valid for all real x. The distinction emphasizes the nature of the relationships expressed in mathematical equations. Understanding when to use each symbol enhances clarity in mathematical communication.
Darth Frodo
Messages
211
Reaction score
1
When is it appropriate to use \equiv as opposed to =?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
well, here are a couple of examples, although I don't know that it would ever be wrong to use = when you mean equivalent.

y = ax + b [this is an "assignment" which is typical for "="]

a + b == b + a [this is not an assignment but a statement of equivalence]
 
Darth Frodo said:
When is it appropriate to use \equiv as opposed to =?
Use ##\equiv## for equations that are identically true, such as (x + 1)2 ##\equiv## x2 + 2x + 1 and sin2(x) + cos2(x) ##\equiv## 1. Each of these equations is true for any real x.

Use = for equations that are conditionally true, such as 2x + 1 = 5. This equation is true only for x = 2; i.e., only under certain conditions.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Oh ok. Thanks Mark & phinds! That really cleared it up!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top